Started By
Message

every announcer, talking head, and analyst....

Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:17 pm
Posted by stephendomalley
alexandria
Member since Dec 2005
5946 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:17 pm
are very politely saying as nice as possible that JD isn't a good qb. no one wants to dump on him -he's playing hard and giving his all, but he just doesn't have it.

only our staff wants to hang with him.

i saw a post on the board where someone suggested this year is about giving player's experience for the future. Well, we need to give the other qbs some experience.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70972 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:17 pm to
So just play a worse qb so that they get reps? That’s what you want to do?

Because Nuss is worse. We’ve seen him
This post was edited on 10/8/22 at 4:18 pm
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57470 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

only our staff wants to hang with him.


21-0
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:18 pm to
We don’t have a qb. And JD is 100%on Kelly.
Posted by LSUScores
Member since Oct 2015
985 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:19 pm to
Yep that seems to be the case
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61436 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Because Nuss is worse. We’ve seen him


Which game are you referring to? The times he got snaps in garbage minutes?

Daniels is given 40 starts and tons of playing time to develop and has plateaued but youre not willing to see what a redshirt freshman can do when given meaningful experience?

Of course he cant compare to Daniels, Nuss has never been allowed the same opportunity Daniels has been given.
Posted by bstew3006
318
Member since Dec 2007
12583 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:20 pm to
His stat line will look good…except in Redzone and in TDs.

He kills drives with the shots he doesn’t take!

Denbrock not getting this WR group involved over the middle is ridiculous.
Posted by DeathByTossDive225
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2019
3961 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:20 pm to
What they’re saying is actually worse.

They’re specifically pointing out that it does not make sense to insert this type of QB with neither our personnel on the outside nor our offensive scheme.

If this were about one guy underperforming, I’d be patient.

But if it’s just bad strategic planning from the guys at the top, then I’m as concerned for the long-term as I am for the season.

Spoiler Alert: it’s on the guys at the top.
This post was edited on 10/8/22 at 4:26 pm
Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
66504 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

So just play a worse qb so that they get reps? That’s what you want to do?

Because Nuss is worse. We’ve seen him


In a blowout loss, yes. Let me see. I believe the RS Fr or Fr can absolutely improve with experience. Daniels is a 4 year starter now.
Posted by Gnash
Cypress, Tx
Member since Oct 2015
5479 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Which game are you referring to? The times he got snaps in garbage minutes?

Throwing up 2 picks vs Southern after JD carved them up, and failing to move the ball vs Aub even with the drops.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22307 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

only our staff wants to hang with him.

Our staff doesn't have much of a choice. The other options transferred to Auburn, aTm, and the Huntin Camp.
Posted by bstew3006
318
Member since Dec 2007
12583 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

They’re specifically pointing out that it does not make sense to insert this type of QB with neither our personnel on the outside nor our offensive scheme.


Denbrock isn’t earning his $$. His playcalling and unwillingness to attack the middle with this WR is ridiculous. He needs to change to his players

It’s almost like they don’t realize the beast they have on the outside…or never had WRs like this and have no clue how to change and get them the ball. That’s why you see so many TE sets and damn near forcing the ball to Taylor.
This post was edited on 10/8/22 at 4:35 pm
Posted by BayouCowboy
Member since Dec 2012
14540 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

So just play a worse qb so that they get reps? That’s what you want to do?

Because Nuss is worse. We’ve seen him

True; however, we aren't winning the SEC this year. Daniels is what he is as a 3rd year starter. Nothing I've seen changes that. I still don't remember a throw over 20 yds. Nuss is a RS FR with one actual start. The probability of him getting better is significantly higher than Daniels suddenly learning how to read a D.
This post was edited on 10/8/22 at 4:29 pm
Posted by LouisianaLonghorn
Austin, Texas
Member since Jan 2006
14248 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

So just play a worse qb so that they get reps? That’s what you want to do?

Because Nuss is worse. We’ve seen him


The consensus before today was that all Daniels needed was more experience and that he'd get better.

Why doesn't Nuss get the same benefit of the doubt? Past experience doesn't necessarily equal future outcome.

We've seen what Daniels can do, and what happens when he comes up against a good defense that's prepared for him.

Give Nuss the chance to do his thing for an entire game, or at least a full half.
Posted by LouisianaLonghorn
Austin, Texas
Member since Jan 2006
14248 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 9:39 pm to
quote:

The probability of him getting better is significantly higher than Daniels suddenly learning how to read a D.


I agree, but for some reason Kelly would rather sink or swim with Daniels. He's not going to suddenly get better. What you see is what you get.
Posted by dandan
Member since Nov 2007
4357 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 9:43 pm to
It’s crazy how this staff simply doesn’t see or doesn’t care.
Posted by MFV
Member since Oct 2008
909 posts
Posted on 10/8/22 at 9:51 pm to
Daniels may be the best we have but he’s not any good. People are going to be suprised how much better the offense gets once someone steps up and replaces him.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70972 posts
Posted on 10/9/22 at 12:59 am to
quote:

The consensus before today was that all Daniels needed was more experience and that he'd get better. Why doesn't Nuss get the same benefit of the doubt? Past experience doesn't necessarily equal future outcome.


This is fine and all but realistically if Nuss isn’t better everyone is just as unhappy

And reality is that he is likely worse than Daniels, which we have seen, and likely a group of coaches on staff have also seen

We don’t have a winning qb this year. It is what it is. Complaining about not playing Nuss when he’s likely not ever going to be the guy over Howard is just sky screaming.
This post was edited on 10/9/22 at 1:01 am
Posted by J2thaROC
Member since May 2018
13074 posts
Posted on 10/9/22 at 1:05 am to
quote:

Well, we need to give the other qbs some experience.



Why? Nuss will never win the starting QB position and Howard would get killed right now.
Posted by J2thaROC
Member since May 2018
13074 posts
Posted on 10/9/22 at 1:06 am to
quote:

Nuss has never been allowed the same opportunity Daniels has been given.



False
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram