- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS lets 'ghost gun' ban stand (while the underlying case is pending)
Posted on 8/8/23 at 6:12 pm to rooster108bm
Posted on 8/8/23 at 6:12 pm to rooster108bm
1
Posted on 8/8/23 at 6:16 pm to Ann Arbor Tiger
quote:
50%? Try again.
Try removing all the fricking illegals that have poured over the border for the last 30 years and count that dumbass.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 6:22 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yes. I might also add, as a 2A true believer, this is nothing to get worked up about.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 6:28 pm to rooster108bm
quote:
Nope. All gun laws trace back to Jim Crow.
Yep.
You don't want this fight with me, son.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 6:31 pm to Dig Deep
I haven’t read anything about this really. But hypothetically if one was to have one of these “ghost guns” would they now be in trouble for possessing said gun? As I understood before you only had to have them serialized if you were to transfer the weapon either as a gift or sale.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 6:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yeah I don't get the emotional melts. These are different standards
Sucks I have to agree with SFP, but I have no clue what most of the comments in this thread are about. ACB has been an excellent justice.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 6:33 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
You don't want this fight with me, son.
#1 I ain't your fricking son. #2 show me your oldest state law on firearms.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 6:35 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Because shutting down our rights temporarily is ok, right?
No. I disagree with it. Just explaining the decision and case posture.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 6:40 pm to rooster108bm
quote:
#1 I ain't your fricking son. #2 show me your oldest state law on firearms.
I'm talking about the correct process to get lasting change, dickhead.
I'm sure you totally own the libs with cringe AF t-shirts and open carry rallies at your local coffee shop, but I've actually worked to make shite happen.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 6:45 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
This is the right way to do it. It sucks, because I'd love for them to just stomp the frick out of all of these bat shite regulations, but that's not how we win.
They can do the opposite - shoot down the regulation until it is properly adjudicated in court. They don't have to allow it to stand and continue to be enforced. Then it gets destroyed in court and that's how the People actually win. Instead they will force the People to come up with the resources to hire a team of attorneys, rather than force the government to do it, even though the government already had them on the payroll.
Judiciary refuses to stand up for the Constitution and for freedom, which should be the default position, rather than defaulting to the government's desire to restrict rights and increase its own power. Our Judiciary is awful. I am constantly amazed at how backwards the Judiciary behaves. But, it's because almost all of them come from a background of working for and working on behalf of the government. They are incapable of seeing things in a different way.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 7:05 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
As usual all talk and no fricking info. Just bullshite.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 7:06 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
The application for stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is granted. The June 30, 2023 order and July 5, 2023 judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, case No. 4:22-cv-691, insofar as they vacate the final rule of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, 87 Fed. Reg. 24652 (April 26, 2022), are stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, if such a writ is timely sought. Should certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.
Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, Justice Gorsuch, and Justice Kavanaugh would deny the application for stay.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 7:07 pm to El Segundo Guy
quote:
Trump should have picked the best Constutionalist available.
He caved to the idea that RGB had to be replaced by a woman, so we got an Affirmative Action nomination.
horse shite
He had to navigate the RINOs in the Senate
Posted on 8/8/23 at 7:08 pm to rooster108bm
Sorry, son, but "nope" doesn't give me a lot to work with.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 7:10 pm to TrueTiger
I remember when “come on down judge Amy Barrett” was a huuuugeee meme here.
What a disappointing this activist judge has been.
What a disappointing this activist judge has been.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 7:21 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Sorry, son, but "nope" doesn't give me a lot to work with.
Well you still haven't shown anything that proves gun laws didn't start with jim crow. So frick you BOY
Posted on 8/8/23 at 7:32 pm to rooster108bm
quote:
Well you still haven't shown anything that proves gun laws didn't start with jim crow. So frick you BOY
I haven't argued that point, son.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 7:35 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Yep.
You don't want this fight with me, son.
Well
You don't want this fight with me, son.
Well
Posted on 8/8/23 at 7:39 pm to rooster108bm
quote:quote:quote:
This is the right way to do it.
Nope.
Yep.
There you go.
Posted on 8/8/23 at 7:41 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Lol. Can't prove me wrong but call me son. You ain't nothing but a pussy. Lol
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News