re: So to all the posters who were on the "Trump committed fraud to get his loans" crowd

Two problems. First the bank needs to have relied on his values and the testimony was that it did not. Second, he has to have given those values intending to defraud the bank. No evidence of that. Actually what I can't believe is that the judge seems to have said he was guilty before the trial even began. I admit I may have misunderstood that, but if I heard right, I can't understand how the judge is still on the case.