Started By
Message

re: JFK....Did Oswald Act Alone?

Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:44 am to
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
72630 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:44 am to
quote:

You misspelled Marcelo and Trafficante.


quote:

go ta hell ole miss


That'll teach him!!
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
13665 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 8:42 am to
quote:

That'll teach him!!


The point clearly went over your head, so I’ll explain. The point was not grammatical, it was substantive, There is little informed debate anymore about who conspired to kill Kennedy. It was Marcello and Trafficante.
Posted by terriblegreen
Souf Badden Rewage
Member since Aug 2011
9679 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 10:05 am to
Oswald didn't act at all. Complete fricking patsy.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64906 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Of course he did. Anyone who believes otherwise subscribes to QAnon nonsense.



My biggest problem with the notion of Oswald acting alone is the fact he had to fire at the President from behind. I’ve seen interviewed with the ER doctors in Dallas who all testified the back of the President’s head was blown out. Then there is the film showing the back of his head indeed being blown out. That doesn’t happen when you’re shot from behind, only when you’re shot from the front.

So, based on the evidence I’ve seen, Oswald was involved for sure in some way. But it’s impossible that he acted alone.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 10:44 am
Posted by UCFACTS4LIFE
Member since Sep 2018
823 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 10:45 am to
What other way could Johnson become President?
Posted by JackDempsey
Lake Charles
Member since May 2023
289 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 2:22 pm to
The Carcano was an accurate rifle. Oswald probably used the iron sights.
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29268 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 2:26 pm to
oswald never even fired a shot at JFK
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

Then there is the film showing the back of his head indeed being blown out. That doesn’t happen when you’re shot from behind, only when you’re shot from the front.


It could easily happen being shot from behind. Skulls are very hard, impact velocity was high, ammo was likely shitty. I dont think this is as concrete an argument as some think.

Posted by Demonbengal
Ruston
Member since May 2015
1392 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 2:53 pm to
The dude literally lived in Russia and married a Russian woman during the Cold War. It ain’t that big of a mystery.
Posted by DRMPHD
College Station, Texas
Member since Jun 2018
192 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 3:20 pm to
There's a great podcast that I listen to called "The Rest is History." Two British historians discussing a wide array of different history topics. They did like a six part podcast on the Kennedy assassination. I highly recommend you give it a listen. Very detailed and interesting. They ultimately concluded Oswald acted alone. Went through all the conspiracy theories and why each is not consistent with the known facts.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 3:22 pm
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36455 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

1) He already attempted an assassination on a general earlier in the year.


Lol. The lamely telegraphed dry run was staged for this exact reason - so that the culprits (James Jesus angleton, Dulles, Hunt etc) could pin it on Oswald and have rubes like you believe them.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 3:30 pm
Posted by JackDempsey
Lake Charles
Member since May 2023
289 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 3:32 pm to
Oh, the irony
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36455 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

And then what do they do? They take all of their resources, all of their careful and meticulous planning. All of their hopes for success and put it in the hands of who? Lee Harvey Oswald, that's who. A disaffected malcontent, who was the 60's version of an incel or some sort of post office shooter. A moron. A failure at everything he tried to be in life. A man who had no success at anything. But this powerful group of elites is gonna say "Here Harv, you got this. Go get 'em".


Wow, so deep man. Counter argument - what if they didn’t put it all in his hands, and used actual professional assassins like Jean Souetre to do it, and instead pinned it in a malcontent loser because he was an easy scapegoat?

Mind you, I was a long time believer that it was LHO solo. But I kept reading and digging. There is no way.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 4:03 pm
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36455 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Been thoroughly proven many times Oswald acted alone. People don’t want to believe it though for a variety of reasons.


You love to chime in as an expert on things you’ve never read an iota about. Let me guess, “people don’t want to believe that a lone gunman killed the president so they concoct fantasies tk feel better.”

That’s the only argument you are capable of. I’ve seen you regurgitate it here before like it’s some clever gotcha.

Call me crazy but I’d rather find out one deranged loner did it then find out actual government officials orchestrated the assassination of the elected United States president, which is what happened.
This post was edited on 2/5/24 at 3:38 pm
Posted by riverdiver
Summerville SC
Member since May 2022
1284 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Oswald acted completely alone


If that’s true, then why doesn’t the government release all of the info?

Open and shut case, right?
Posted by Zander Kelley
Member since Jan 2024
346 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 5:56 pm to
No way. CIA planned it and to make sure they got away with it they had Jacob Rubenstein (Ruby) shoot Oswald very similar to how Rocco killed Hymen Roth in GF2.
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28428 posts
Posted on 2/5/24 at 6:14 pm to
Kennedy is still dead.
Posted by Buck Magnum
Springdale
Member since Dec 2003
11624 posts
Posted on 2/6/24 at 4:26 am to
It was LBJ and the CIA. I think Oswald thought he was involved more than he was going to be. The immediate aftermath of the jfk shooting is the key. I think Oswald brought the gun to the Texas Book Depository for the assassin. He had nothing to do with killing JD Tippett and the Texas Theater was his meet up location for his CIA contact. The CIA killed Tippett to make it look like Oswald did it but the timing of the events didn’t add up. Why else would Oswald declare he wasn’t a patsy?
Posted by cypresstiger
The South
Member since Aug 2008
10652 posts
Posted on 2/6/24 at 6:17 am to
Not this again
Posted by Buck Magnum
Springdale
Member since Dec 2003
11624 posts
Posted on 2/6/24 at 7:25 am to
Yes, this again!
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram