- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rome, Venice, Florence, or Milan
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:38 am to Roy Curado
Posted on 3/8/24 at 11:38 am to Roy Curado
I would do Rome one day, then hope on the train to Florence on day 2.
0
Posted on 3/9/24 at 10:57 am to Roy Curado
I would rank them in this order:
Rome
Florence
Venice
Milan
I love Venice but 2 nights is plenty and not the place I would choose to go for my first time if I only had 4 days. Rome and Florence have many more things to do and see. You could spend a month in Rome and not see everything. Florence is also great and very walkable. Additionally, you could do day trips to smaller Tuscan cities from your base in Florence. Also, in my opinion, you are very incorrect about Rome being touristy and Venice being chill/calm.
I would pick one out of Rome/Florence based off the main attractions and spend the entire fours days there. You can not go wrong with either.
If it were me and my first time, I would go Rome. It will be off-season and not as crowded as summer. Vatican, Colossuem, best pizza out of the listed cities, Carbonara, cacio e pepe...
Rome
Florence
Venice
Milan
I love Venice but 2 nights is plenty and not the place I would choose to go for my first time if I only had 4 days. Rome and Florence have many more things to do and see. You could spend a month in Rome and not see everything. Florence is also great and very walkable. Additionally, you could do day trips to smaller Tuscan cities from your base in Florence. Also, in my opinion, you are very incorrect about Rome being touristy and Venice being chill/calm.
I would pick one out of Rome/Florence based off the main attractions and spend the entire fours days there. You can not go wrong with either.
If it were me and my first time, I would go Rome. It will be off-season and not as crowded as summer. Vatican, Colossuem, best pizza out of the listed cities, Carbonara, cacio e pepe...
Posted on 3/9/24 at 7:00 pm to baldona
Verona is bad arse!
Amarone is awesome wine.
Amarone is awesome wine.
Posted on 3/9/24 at 7:34 pm to Pfft
quote:
Why not fly into Milan, check out Lake Como, and then head north. Take the train through the alps on something like the Bernina Express. Check out Zermatt then Lucerne on your way to Basel. you could do the train for all of these. Would be a fantastic trip.
This is what I would do unless this was a once in a lifetime, only trip to Italy. Then I’d split between Rome and Florence.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News