- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelicans are not expected to offer BI extension this offseason, moving in new direction
Posted on 5/4/24 at 3:14 pm to teke184
Posted on 5/4/24 at 3:14 pm to teke184
quote:
The worst was FVV, who they lost for nothing. Not that he was ever worth as much as OG or Siakam but they still got SOME value for each of those two. They got dick for Fred.
All sunk cost theory. Sometimes you just have to move on even if your assets value has declined. Lot of GMs struggle with this.
Posted on 5/4/24 at 3:18 pm to Pels_Yaz
Ujiri is great at identifying and developing talent.
He is shite at doing trades involving it because he overvalues his pieces to the point where teams don’t negotiate, they move on completely.
He is shite at doing trades involving it because he overvalues his pieces to the point where teams don’t negotiate, they move on completely.
Posted on 5/4/24 at 4:12 pm to Pels_Yaz
GM's and most of us really, struggle with sunk cost and when to step up and recognize that an asset has lost value and may lose still more. It's hard to accept.
Here though I think with Brandon you can mitigate that to a large degree. If you, for example, made a deal with Hawks trading BI for DeJounte Murray, but had to forgo a pick from them, or even include one yourself, you are getting a good asset in return who, because of fit or skill set, may end up making your line up better even if he isn't technically a better player.
On paper, Murray's production is very much in line with Brandon's, albeit from a different position. But that's a plus to me because now you get a long, scoring PG and also possibly free up a spot in the starting line up for Trey or at least give him more shots and minutes, depending on what other deals you make.
Here though I think with Brandon you can mitigate that to a large degree. If you, for example, made a deal with Hawks trading BI for DeJounte Murray, but had to forgo a pick from them, or even include one yourself, you are getting a good asset in return who, because of fit or skill set, may end up making your line up better even if he isn't technically a better player.
On paper, Murray's production is very much in line with Brandon's, albeit from a different position. But that's a plus to me because now you get a long, scoring PG and also possibly free up a spot in the starting line up for Trey or at least give him more shots and minutes, depending on what other deals you make.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News