Started By
Message

re: Pelicans are not expected to offer BI extension this offseason, moving in new direction

Posted on 5/4/24 at 3:14 pm to
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9237 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

The worst was FVV, who they lost for nothing. Not that he was ever worth as much as OG or Siakam but they still got SOME value for each of those two. They got dick for Fred.


All sunk cost theory. Sometimes you just have to move on even if your assets value has declined. Lot of GMs struggle with this.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96713 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 3:18 pm to
Ujiri is great at identifying and developing talent.

He is shite at doing trades involving it because he overvalues his pieces to the point where teams don’t negotiate, they move on completely.
Posted by New City Champ
Member since Jul 2018
457 posts
Posted on 5/4/24 at 4:12 pm to
GM's and most of us really, struggle with sunk cost and when to step up and recognize that an asset has lost value and may lose still more. It's hard to accept.

Here though I think with Brandon you can mitigate that to a large degree. If you, for example, made a deal with Hawks trading BI for DeJounte Murray, but had to forgo a pick from them, or even include one yourself, you are getting a good asset in return who, because of fit or skill set, may end up making your line up better even if he isn't technically a better player.

On paper, Murray's production is very much in line with Brandon's, albeit from a different position. But that's a plus to me because now you get a long, scoring PG and also possibly free up a spot in the starting line up for Trey or at least give him more shots and minutes, depending on what other deals you make.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram