- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pelicans are not expected to offer BI extension this offseason, moving in new direction
Posted on 5/5/24 at 7:44 am to Soggymoss
Posted on 5/5/24 at 7:44 am to Soggymoss
Something I have been thinking about that I haven’t seen anyone mention is what if BI demands a trade once we decline to offer him a max?
It hasn’t been brought up often but Willie benching him and choosing not to bring him back in against the Lakers in the play in was a big deal. He was absolutely terrible after that game, almost like he couldn’t recover.
I see a lot of back and forth on if CJ would accept a diminished role moving forward. I really think it is less likely that BI would accept a diminished role. If we aren’t offering the max, I don’t see any way he is still announced last in starting lineups or is the center of the big mural in the facility. At that point, I don’t see how he accepts that role. Maybe I am wrong, but I do see it as a strong possibility that he doesn’t really want to be here in a diminished role on a decreased salary.
It hasn’t been brought up often but Willie benching him and choosing not to bring him back in against the Lakers in the play in was a big deal. He was absolutely terrible after that game, almost like he couldn’t recover.
I see a lot of back and forth on if CJ would accept a diminished role moving forward. I really think it is less likely that BI would accept a diminished role. If we aren’t offering the max, I don’t see any way he is still announced last in starting lineups or is the center of the big mural in the facility. At that point, I don’t see how he accepts that role. Maybe I am wrong, but I do see it as a strong possibility that he doesn’t really want to be here in a diminished role on a decreased salary.
Posted on 5/5/24 at 8:08 am to ThePistol
quote:
Maybe I am wrong, but I do see it as a strong possibility that he doesn’t really want to be here in a diminished role on a decreased salary.
Agreed, but someone in a position like that also needs to know that we will try to reasonably do right by him unless we get a Godfather offer.
A team trading for him is generally going to be one that would want to pay him and give him a good role, even if it isn’t the face of the franchise.
Being #3 in Philly behind a former MVP in Embiid as well as Maxey may be a bit to pride but he will still be a major cog on a high profile team.
Posted on 5/5/24 at 8:11 am to ThePistol
quote:
It hasn’t been brought up often but Willie benching him and choosing not to bring him back in against the Lakers in the play in was a big deal. He was absolutely terrible after that game, almost like he couldn’t recover.
He was pretty good in the Kings game a couple days later so I think his play had much more to do with the matchup with OKC.
However, I think you are correct in that it probably had an effect on how we played the Thunder series. I didnt seem like there was anyway we were going to sit him in crunch time of any of those games no matter how poorly he was playing. I wonder how much of that was missing Zion versus our fear of him pouting about benching him again
Posted on 5/5/24 at 9:40 am to ThePistol
quote:he’s under contract for next season for 36MM dollars. Expiring.
Something I have been thinking about that I haven’t seen anyone mention is what if BI demands a trade once we decline to offer him a max?
they’ll get a decent return for that. Best possible scenario is that Ingram asks for a trade before the draft
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News