- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread
Posted on 5/16/24 at 3:17 pm to TeddyPadillac
Posted on 5/16/24 at 3:17 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
Do they really believe the current rostered team can win a championship, and are willing to pay the ridiculous repeater tax again, as well as the other restrictions they'll get?
I think they do and their owner isn’t that concerned with monetary issues. I mean you don’t trade for Harden and not resign him. He actually played decent this season and wouldn’t be surprised if he has an understanding of signing a long term deal.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 3:18 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
Miles Bridges
He should be nowhere near this team
Posted on 5/16/24 at 3:48 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
at you for heaping scorn against my Wiz trade when Deni will be better than every player in this
I did it just for you my man
Posted on 5/16/24 at 8:45 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:06 pm to TigerinATL
Sounds like Garland will be on the move then.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:27 pm to TigerinATL
Ok sign an extension then.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:30 pm to TigerinATL
Who the hell says “They’re happy in Cleveland” lol.
Cleveland is literally the shittiest place to live; he’s lying through his teeth.
Cleveland is literally the shittiest place to live; he’s lying through his teeth.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:38 pm to Pels_Yaz
quote:
Who the hell says “They’re happy in Cleveland” lol.
Cleveland is literally the shittiest place to live; he’s lying through his teeth.
“Every country have city they make fun of.
In United States, it is Cleveland.
In Soviet Russia… it is Cleveland. - Yakov Smirnov
Posted on 5/17/24 at 9:28 am to teke184
Posted on 5/17/24 at 9:30 am to TigerinATL
It seems like Garland/Allen is a target that makes sense for both teams.
BI/Nance for Garland/Allen does indeed work straight up. Its just a matter of who needs to add value where. I assume us, at least 21, but I'm not sure how much more it would take.
BI/Nance for Garland/Allen does indeed work straight up. Its just a matter of who needs to add value where. I assume us, at least 21, but I'm not sure how much more it would take.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 9:40 am to Fun Bunch
I think BI is the get in that trade and we help get them off of Allen. I don't think we should be giving up trade assets to make this work.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 9:46 am to saints5021
I guess it depends on how you look at it.
Allen is worth more in a vacuum than Nance, a lot more.
Its debatable as to who is worth more out of BI and Garland I would wager, given Garland is under long term contract.
Allen is worth more in a vacuum than Nance, a lot more.
Its debatable as to who is worth more out of BI and Garland I would wager, given Garland is under long term contract.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 9:53 am to whatiknowsofar
Since Cleve is dropping them drawers
If I need to give up Lakers pick to keep Herb then I do that too.
Both teams get what they want.
If I need to give up Lakers pick to keep Herb then I do that too.
Both teams get what they want.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 9:56 am to 50_Tiger
No, overpay by Pels for Garland who’s on a bad contract
Posted on 5/17/24 at 9:57 am to Soggymoss
quote:
No, overpay by Pels for Garland who’s on a bad contract
Explain to me how is this an overpay when you have to make the money work.
No one is taking Larry without picks attached. I operate in reality.
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:01 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
No one is taking Larry without picks attached
Larry is on an expiring deal, no money after this season, and he’s actually on a good contract for what he provides, so I don’t understand why you think we have to pay to send him out.
Garland is a negative asset due to his contract that is about 10-15 million a year to high, so if you want to consider Larry a bad asset at a 12 million expiring then ok they balance out and Larry for Garland is a wash.
BI for Allen is an overpay by itself, much less adding Dyson AND picks to that.
Swap Allen for Mobley then we talk
This post was edited on 5/17/24 at 10:03 am
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:04 am to 50_Tiger
Adding Dyson is a bridge too far for me
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:05 am to Soggymoss
quote:
Garland is a negative asset
I do not think this is true at all
Posted on 5/17/24 at 10:08 am to Fun Bunch
If yall think WE Devalue BI, yall should go look at some NBA boards.
I saw one national board trade proposal and were giving up Dyson and like 3 picks along with BI for Garland.
I saw one national board trade proposal and were giving up Dyson and like 3 picks along with BI for Garland.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News