re: Clark: Pels open to BI extension, but not at max

quote:

---

Yea I mean not thinking we need a PG Isa weird perspective. The best pg on the pels is a borderline top 10 guy on the team. As stated, the teams hanging around in the playoffs have a PG who can initiate or score. You can't run a novelty offense into the finals. Your B or C player has to be that guy and if we run Zion and BI/Murphy the other guy has to be someone like a Conley or Garland minimum. Or you need SGA.

---

A weird perspective is thinking Mike Conley is somehow the floor general for the Wolves and that he makes their offense tick. He has the 4th highest usage rate amongst their rotation players, and he's only percentage points ahead of their 3 and D wing (McDaniels) and the prototypical low usage center (Gobert).

I'd obviously love to have an awesome point guard. Unfortunately, those guys are tough to acquire. I think a swing for Garland could make sense, not only is he a good passer like many on this board want, he also has shown good 3 point shooting chops and he should be able to play some off ball.

he has had an up and down year just like BI, so he may actually be attainable, and I think the Cavs will likely be trying to mix things up in an effort to keep Mitchell this offseason.