Started By
Message

re: Diving deeper on Standard Lithium?

Posted on 5/15/24 at 2:27 pm to
Posted by Fe_Mike
Member since Jul 2015
3176 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 2:27 pm to


quote:

Absolute worst case scenario, SLI just got a $160M investment for 45% of the company. That's a $350 mil valuation which should put the share price over $2. So if you're reading this in the most pessimistic way possible, share price should still be 60% higher. In reality, SLI just got $160M (with $30M cash up front) to fund near term operations and development that is no strings attached. No repayment, no interest, no nothing. It's a good faith down payment. Equinor will fund 45% of the capex for SWA Ark ($600M) and 45% of the capex for East TX (who knows, probably represents north of $1B extremely conservatively). That basically represents a back of the napkin $2B investment for 45% of the company assuming success, or a valuation of 4.4 billion. $25/share.

For reference, SLI’s published implied valuation of the deal was $300M

Just tried to figure out where our discrepancy was and it looks like SLI’s valuation discounts the $60M for the workplan as those are project payments. SLI only owns 55% of the projects so technically only realize $33M of the $60M commitment. So SLI will see $133M from this deal, not $160. Pre-FID.
This post was edited on 5/15/24 at 2:38 pm
Posted by gautamj
Member since Sep 2023
57 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:10 am to
If AOGC ends up setting an obnoxiously high royalty rate like 10%, do you folks think SWA will be financially viable?
I think someone from SLI quoted before AOGC that 1A will not be viable at that high royalty rate.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram