- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
JFK Zapruder Film Analysis (2 shots only)
Posted on 5/8/23 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 5/8/23 at 1:56 pm
It's an hour long but it was interesting. Looking at the timing of the film, he believes only 2 shots were captured in the film. The first shot was fired right before the Zapruder film started.
I thought initially he was going to venture into conspiracy but he really just pushed errors in the Warren Commission and things they missed on the timing of the shots.
His analysis is more believable than the Warren Commission analysis that he got off 3 shots in what 6 to 7 seconds.
YT
I thought initially he was going to venture into conspiracy but he really just pushed errors in the Warren Commission and things they missed on the timing of the shots.
His analysis is more believable than the Warren Commission analysis that he got off 3 shots in what 6 to 7 seconds.
YT
15
Posted on 5/8/23 at 1:58 pm to jp4lsu
The SUPER DUPER magic bullet.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:01 pm to jp4lsu
quote:
It's an hour long but it was interesting. Looking at the timing of the film, he believes only 2 shots were captured in the film.
I’m not going to watch an hour-long video. Does he claim Oswald killed Kennedy taking 2 or 3 shots?
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:02 pm to jp4lsu
Nope.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:05 pm to Decatur
He does believe Oswald assassinated JFK. I enjoyed watching it, it was interesting and he made valid points.
The whole thing fascinates me too. There is definite questions I have and don't believe the "consensus" of Oswald acting on his own.
The whole thing fascinates me too. There is definite questions I have and don't believe the "consensus" of Oswald acting on his own.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:06 pm to Smeg
quote:
The SUPER DUPER magic bullet.
Such a tired trope that usually ignores the elevation difference between the rear and middle seats, and the fact that Connally was seated inboard of the President.
This post was edited on 5/8/23 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:21 pm to jp4lsu
In addition to my belief that Newtonian physics supports the fatal shot captured on Zapruder having come from in front, I also strongly believe that reasonable minds must draw negative inferences from concealment and/or spoliation of evidence. Why has it taken acts of Congress to reveal the records? And why have even those mandated disclosures been slow-rolled, obstructed, and redacted? Why did the CIA deny having a relationship with Oswald?
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:22 pm to jp4lsu
So they found something different from being watched for 60 years?
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:22 pm to SquaringCircles
quote:
In addition to my belief that Newtonian physics supports the fatal shot captured on Zapruder having come from in front,
???
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:23 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
So they found something different from being watched for 60 years?
Yea, man. You only have to watch their hour-long video to discover the truth.
Its not click bait or anything though.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:24 pm to jp4lsu
The people further from the camera, on the grass opposite the road, are larger than the people in the car. It's a a big stitch job. The shooting didn't even happen there
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:25 pm to Gaggle
quote:
The shooting didn't even happen there
And there goes any chance of actual discussion.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:28 pm to jp4lsu
Eventually the government is going to say it was one single shot. It flew around dealey plaza like a damn bumble bee.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:37 pm to jp4lsu
No shite. Why you think the JFK files still haven’t been declassified?
The ones that haven’t been burned. You will never know the truth.
The ones that haven’t been burned. You will never know the truth.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:43 pm to TigerAttorney
quote:
The ones that haven’t been burned. You will never know the truth.
This is most likely the answer.
Though I do not have an issue with "the narrative" as far as LHO being the only shooter and the ballistics of the actual shooting, etc. That all flies for me.
My skepticism of the official story centers around whether Oswald truly acted/planned the assassination alone. I find it incredibly hard to believe that he did--he just had too many connections to the USSR, Cubans, etc for me to buy that without "proof". But as you point out, we'll never know the truth of that.
This post was edited on 5/8/23 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:43 pm to Indefatigable
From what I understand, they never found the bullet that hit his head. They did find fragments in his brain, indicative of a frangible bullet. Oswald was firing full metal jackets. I’m not a ballistics expert, to say the least. Just sharing what I’ve read and heard.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:45 pm to TigerAttorney
I'm afraid so. It has to be more than some connection of Oswald to CIA. It has to be more nefarious than a little talking between Jack Ruby, Oswald, etc. It even has to be more nefarious than the Feds knowing Oswald's ideology and travels and not doing anything about it.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 2:53 pm to Indefatigable
Oswald made a previous assassination attempt on someone just months prior to Kennedy and failed. Kind of like Jeffrey Epstein, he succeeded on the second attempt.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 3:17 pm to jp4lsu
Gov. Connally's very quick head turn to his right at frame 165 is the best evidence of the first shot, Right before the car passes in front of the Stemmon's freeway sign. That puts the timing from first to third at approximately 158 frames, or 8.5 seconds. Very achievable for someone with intermediate or higher shooting experience.
Posted on 5/8/23 at 3:17 pm to jp4lsu
quote:
He does believe Oswald assassinated JFK. I enjoyed watching it, it was interesting and he made valid points.
The whole thing fascinates me too. There is definite questions I have and don't believe the "consensus" of Oswald acting on his own.
Two female employees working in the Texas School Book Depository told investigators that Oswald was in the stairwell and break room during the shooting. The three were getting something to eat.
The women's testimony was repressed by the Commission and they were both threatened.
Looking at all the facts rules out Oswald. Oswald was killed so no evidence could be presented at his trial.
By killing the fall guy, other witnesses got a chance to live and/or not get tortured. Other witnesses were killed.
Interesting Documentary:
JFK Revisited: Through the Looking Glass
2021
TV-14
1h 58m
quote:
After the 1991 film JFK, Congress enacts the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992, establishing a review board to declassify assassination-related documents. The film disputes the chain of evidence for the "single bullet" that caused wounds to Kennedy and Governor John Connally. Researcher Barry Ernest, author of the 2010 JFK book The Girl on the Stairs, is interviewed about alleged witness statements purportedly casting doubt on the timeline of Lee Harvey Oswald's movements immediately after the assassination.
Wikipedia
This post was edited on 5/8/23 at 6:20 pm
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News