Started By
Message

re: How Can You Explain OJ’s Blood Found at the Crime Scene?

Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:18 pm to
Posted by bott18240
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
563 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 7:18 pm to
The jurors who wanted to vote guilty were also pressured into swapping to not guilty. The verdict took 4 hours of deliberation which is absolutely unheard of for a year long trial. The jurors had their minds made up ahead of time and didn’t care, they wanted to go home. They basically admitted that.
Also the glove was a major reason they acquitted. But OJ didn’t take his arthritis meds leading up to it, wore a plastic glove before putting on the murder glove, basically assuring that it wouldn’t fit.
There’s no question he did it in my mind.
This post was edited on 4/11/24 at 7:20 pm
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15375 posts
Posted on 4/11/24 at 9:08 pm to
From watching the video, I don't see that the glove fully doesn't fit. Yes it's tight and he struggled to put it on, but he did successfully put it on. Besides, who says someone can't commit a crime while wearing small gloves?

Then when we consider that the glove was blood soaked and he had latex gloves on already,I really don't see how that was successfully used as this big smoking gun.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram