- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Don’t be surprised if Russia uses a tactical Nuke soon
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:47 pm to Catchfalaya
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:47 pm to Catchfalaya
quote:
Just saying! They don’t have the worlds biggest arsenal of tactical nukes for shits n giggles. After this ridiculous aid package passed decision makers in the Kremlin are most likely mulling knocking out the re-supply convoys that will be heading east soon.
0
Posted on 4/24/24 at 6:49 pm to Catchfalaya
dumb take. russia has absolutely no reason to use them as they are clearly winning. they have nothing to gain and literally everything to lose by using one.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:03 pm to Catchfalaya
As long as it stops the uni-party and cia from raping taxpayers and fermenting more color revolutions, it's a win for the US.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:18 pm to Catchfalaya
I think it is less and less likely the more the whittle down the Ukrainians and cost the US more debt for nothing.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:50 pm to Tandemjay
quote:
fermenting
They're making liquor too?!?!?
Posted on 4/24/24 at 8:56 pm to Catchfalaya
quote:
Don’t be surprised if Russia uses a tactical Nuke soon
Haha no they won't, they're winning and that would be retarded, using a nuke would get the West involved. They have some other weapons they haven't used yet that aren't nukes, like the ODAB-500, it's nasty.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:32 pm to Timeoday
It used to be that when something was secretly done YOU DIDN’T ANNOUNCE IT. This administration is full of idiots.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:39 pm to MilwaukeeKosherDills
quote:
Putin is still killing thousands of civilians.
Source?
This conflict has the lowest civilian casualty rate of any war of this scale in history. I know it doesn't fit the narrative the MSM in the West spins, but it's the reality. There is a reason people are still partying in the streets during air raid sirens in Kyiv and Odesa...it's because they know they're not a target. Their biggest risk is getting hit by an air defense missile
Posted on 4/24/24 at 9:47 pm to Catchfalaya
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:03 pm to Catchfalaya
If it ends this Ukraine puppet shite, not my problem.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 10:13 pm to ColtRange
quote:
Source?
These aren't military bases. They're cities. Mariupol and Bakhmut, respectively. I don't like our spending in Ukraine either, but let's not pretend that Putin and the Russians are the good guys here.
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:03 pm to Tantal
well... I'll just leave this here and let you read it and think about it:
Leaked military documents outline Russia's doctrine for tactical nuclear weapons use, including the minimum criteria for using tactical nuclear weapons...
The criteria range "from an enemy incursion on Russian territory to more specific triggers, such as the destruction of 20% of Russia's strategic ballistic missile submarines," the FT said.
The destruction of three or more large surface warships, three airfields, 30% of its nuclear-powered attack submarines, or a "simultaneous hit on main and reserve coastal command centers" are also listed as potential conditions for a nuclear strike.
Financial Times (via Yahoo News): Leaked files reveal Russian military's criteria for nuclear strike
granted... I think some of those trigger scenarios have already happened...
Leaked military documents outline Russia's doctrine for tactical nuclear weapons use, including the minimum criteria for using tactical nuclear weapons...
The criteria range "from an enemy incursion on Russian territory to more specific triggers, such as the destruction of 20% of Russia's strategic ballistic missile submarines," the FT said.
The destruction of three or more large surface warships, three airfields, 30% of its nuclear-powered attack submarines, or a "simultaneous hit on main and reserve coastal command centers" are also listed as potential conditions for a nuclear strike.
Financial Times (via Yahoo News): Leaked files reveal Russian military's criteria for nuclear strike
granted... I think some of those trigger scenarios have already happened...
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:05 pm to BuckyCheese
Just saying
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:22 pm to Tantal
quote:
These aren't military bases. They're cities. Mariupol and Bakhmut, respectively.
This is not at all what I asked, the person I was responding to said Russia was still killing civilians by the thousands, that's completely false. Bakhmut was the site of the largest battle in decades, there were up to 100,000 Ukrainian soldiers in Bakhmut and the surrounding areas. 99% of the civilians had fled, it was indeed a military target at that point.
quote:
I don't like our spending in Ukraine either, but let's not pretend that Putin and the Russians are the good guys here.
Neither are good guys, yet the news tells me one is fighting for democracy worldwide and the other is committing genocide. I feel bad for the Ukrainian population, I think they're led by scumbags. I wish they had the opportunity to have elections and vote on whether they wanted to continue this war, but they didn't get that opportunity. They're not going to win this war, continuing to rob American taxpayers in order to facilitate more death there is evil. Somehow I am considered a piece of shite for this thinking this way
Posted on 4/24/24 at 11:28 pm to Catchfalaya
The US made the consequences known. This isn't going to happen unless things are bad bad
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:11 am to Catchfalaya
Great analysis from a mouth breather
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:19 am to Catchfalaya
Russia is winning they don’t need to use a nuke unless nato starts trying to send troops or making direct attacks on Russia.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 12:22 am to Catchfalaya
quote:
Don’t be surprised if Russia uses a tactical Nuke soon
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 4:33 am to Catchfalaya
We’ve been hearing this for two years now. Russia isn’t going to do anything but continue to string this out so we keep sending billions to Ukraine.
Posted on 4/25/24 at 6:00 am to Catchfalaya
Yeah I look at what’s going on in Ukraine and Putler looks very desperate as the Ghost of Kiev keeps wiping out division after division of Russian infantry. Plus he’s already sabotaged Nordstream Pipeline so this is very likely.
Said no one with an IQ above the Sub Saharan mean average.
Said no one with an IQ above the Sub Saharan mean average.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News