Started By
Message

re: David Pecker testimony ends up backing Trump's story.

Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:11 pm to
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
7665 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

ve been following the live updates of the Trump trial and it blows my mind that New York doesn't allow cameras in courtrooms for criminal trials. 100% of criminal trials should be videoed.


I completely agree. The NY Court is releasing the transcripts within 24 hours. Here is the link LINK

The problem is this allows for a full day's worth of reporting based on what will inevitably be a lot of biased reporting and can lead to cut and paste jobs of actual testimony that distorts the truth.

quote:

Now, based on Pecker's testimony so far I don't see what was done, was illegal. He testified on cross that the work McDougal was paid for was worth more than what she was paid. That if the doorman story was true he would've run it and other things, and that he relayed to, the known perjurer, Cohen that the actions he was taking were vetted by an election attorney and it was okayed.


Again I'm not arguing the legality of the case. Just trying to establish whether or not the OP's post from Fox and the quote Trump “had no idea what [he] was talking about” is actually referring to the payments.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram