Started By
Message

re: This is why the tornado grading scale needs to be changed…

Posted on 5/2/24 at 1:20 pm to
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
55128 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 1:20 pm to
Anyone want to play along with this thought experiment?

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


He added....

quote:

I'll even give you some hints. 1. We issued a considerable tag tornado warning for this. 2. It is a supercell getting overtaken by a QLCS/embedded within it. 3. Probabilities based off SPC's tornado intensity probability are 96% EF-1+, 77% EF-2+, 38% EF-3+ and 14% EF-4 +. Enjoy!


quote:

Forgot one last thing....This VROT persisted for multiple scans at greater than 50 knots.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
55128 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 5:20 pm to
And the answer, which is kind of what I figured.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


That's the problem with taking radar at face value.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram