- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Judge" sides with people that blocked interstate for 4 hrs?
Posted on 5/2/24 at 12:19 pm to MFn GIMP
Posted on 5/2/24 at 12:19 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Is she saying that the State didn't prove these defendants were the actual people who did it and that police were wrong to only use social media to identify them? If that is the reason she sided with the defense then I'm on the fence about it but since guilty beyond a reasonable doubt is the standard I lean towards being ok with that.. If she is saying that police simply shouldn't have been able to use social media at all even though they knew, or previously suspected, this was them then I'm against this judgement.
What’s the issue with recognizing them from social media?
A sizable number of protestors in those liberal strongholds are “serial protestors”, they’re available anytime someone calls for bodies.
2
Posted on 5/2/24 at 12:23 pm to riverdiver
On top of that, im sure local PD can subpoena cell phone records to triangulate people to these locations to further solidify they were there.
Especially if these dumbfricks were posting it from the same phones and had geo-locations being marked in photos they posted of this.
Especially if these dumbfricks were posting it from the same phones and had geo-locations being marked in photos they posted of this.
Posted on 5/2/24 at 12:37 pm to riverdiver
quote:
What’s the issue with recognizing them from social media?
I don't think there is anything wrong with it but the State has the burden to prove the defendant is guilty. If they weren't arrested at the scene, were wearing masks or there is no photographic/video evidence of them being there at all, so that they are not easily identifiable. I don't think someone should be convicted if it can't be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that they committed the crime.
quote:
A sizable number of protestors in those liberal strongholds are “serial protestors”, they’re available anytime someone calls for bodies
Being a serial protestor isn't a crime, in and of itself. Would you want to be arrested solely because you have a connection with some group or would you want the State to prove you participated in the criminal act?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News