Started By
Message

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:52 am to
Posted by Soggymoss
Member since Aug 2018
14600 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:52 am to
If he were on a Murray type deal at 20ish million a year, then yes it would be.

At 40 million a year he has no value
Posted by 50_Tiger
Dallas TX
Member since Jan 2016
40299 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:59 am to
Use Garland to get Murray then
Posted by Baron
Member since Dec 2014
1708 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 10:04 am to
quote:

At 40 million a year he has no value


No value is a little strong, but yes you are correct that his value is greatly diminished with that contract. Him on Murray’s contract would be a no-brainer.

Would we really be that much better off paying Garland $164 million the next 4 years over paying CJ $63 million the next two?

Based on contracts and cost of acquisition, for me I’d rank them:

Murray


Garland
Trae
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram