- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 10:17 am to L S Usetheforce
Posted on 5/11/24 at 10:17 am to L S Usetheforce
Not sure why some people are having trouble with this. By the letter of the rule, it was clearly interference. Granted LSU should never have been in a position to lose a game that way, and I think the rule is ridiculous and needs further clarification. But that is the rule. And by the rule, this was undoubtedly interference.
Anybody who watches baseball has seen this play many, many times called interference. One has to wonder if the roles were reversed, would the LSU baserunner have been called out for interference???
Anybody who watches baseball has seen this play many, many times called interference. One has to wonder if the roles were reversed, would the LSU baserunner have been called out for interference???
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News