re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule

Not sure why some people are having trouble with this. By the letter of the rule, it was clearly interference. Granted LSU should never have been in a position to lose a game that way, and I think the rule is ridiculous and needs further clarification. But that is the rule. And by the rule, this was undoubtedly interference.

Anybody who watches baseball has seen this play many, many times called interference. One has to wonder if the roles were reversed, would the LSU baserunner have been called out for interference???