- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Cohen Testimony Question
Posted on 5/13/24 at 8:41 am
Posted on 5/13/24 at 8:41 am
I'm sure the judge will do anything and everything to protect the prosecutions case, but is/will the defense be able to press Cohen on his prior statements/conviction to discredit him?
Guilty of perjury
Flip flop statements over the years on video
His twitter post of trump behind bars
All seems fair game, but is it allowed under law?
Guilty of perjury
Flip flop statements over the years on video
His twitter post of trump behind bars
All seems fair game, but is it allowed under law?
5
Posted on 5/13/24 at 8:43 am to Lsut81
quote:Yes.
is it allowed under law?
But this court is not bound by law.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 9:09 am to Lsut81
Makes you wonder who would employ a scumbag liar like that......for 10 years....doesn't
Posted on 5/13/24 at 9:11 am to Lsut81
This is a banana republic judgewhose daughter has taken in millions in Dem contributions over the trial
Should just open a bookie telephone number so bets can be placed for guilty.
Should just open a bookie telephone number so bets can be placed for guilty.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 9:14 am to Lsut81
Has the prosecution proved bookkeeping fraud to steal an election yet?
I've been following this case and reading witness testimony and IDK what fraud as been committed yet. I know the prosecution probably as the lowest threshold in the US judicial history to prove bookkeeping fraud due to the jury make-up but I'm really having a difficult time finding the crime based on the testimony up to this point.
Maybe the prosecution is sandbagging and has a bombshell to drop. Something like Trump signed a check with a number 2 pencil instead of permanent ink.
I've been following this case and reading witness testimony and IDK what fraud as been committed yet. I know the prosecution probably as the lowest threshold in the US judicial history to prove bookkeeping fraud due to the jury make-up but I'm really having a difficult time finding the crime based on the testimony up to this point.
Maybe the prosecution is sandbagging and has a bombshell to drop. Something like Trump signed a check with a number 2 pencil instead of permanent ink.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 9:40 am to Lsut81
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News