Started By
Message

Dynasty trade advice

Posted on 5/15/24 at 4:07 pm
Posted by Bonjourno
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2010
2713 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 4:07 pm
One QB, TE 0.5 bump for receptions

A. Chase

B. Laporta, J Reed, 2024 1.10

Who you taking?
Posted by Tigerdogz
Member since Nov 2011
425 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 7:03 pm to
Chase is still more valuable. Is it 10team or 12 team? How many roster spots?
Posted by Bonjourno
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2010
2713 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 11:23 pm to
9 starters, 10 bench, 3 taxi
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40798 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 8:40 am to
It’s tough to give up Chase but B comes out way ahead according to the fantasy pros dynasty trade value chart. Laporta with a TE premium is a monster.
Posted by Bonjourno
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2010
2713 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:13 am to
Yea keep trade cut had B way ahead also. I got tons of offers last offseason for Chase and Waddle. Waddle rough year hopefully he bounces back. Nobody has come knocking for him this year
Posted by GeauxTigers6447
Member since Nov 2014
181 posts
Posted on 5/16/24 at 3:50 pm to
I would keep Chase. Elite players are hard to come by.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8358 posts
Posted on 5/18/24 at 7:36 am to
LaPorta sure looks primed to be the elite TE in the league
Posted by tigers32
Member since Mar 2012
5637 posts
Posted on 5/18/24 at 10:17 am to
I prefer Chase without more information about each team’s roster. LaPorta obviously had a great rookie season, but it’s fair to question whether he will score that many TD’s again.
Posted by WuShock
Metairie
Member since Aug 2018
1324 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 11:39 am to
quote:

I prefer Chase without more information about each team’s roster.

I agree with this. Who are your other WR's and TE's?
Posted by Shameless
Member since Jan 2017
831 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 12:33 pm to
Im probably sticking with Chase here but that is pretty enticing. The 1.10 here is probably what, Ladd or Benson caliber? Reed is a fun WR2/WR3 type but I don’t expect him to consistently command a large target share when all Packers receivers are healthy. He’ll be spotty. Laporta in a 1.5 PPR is probably overvalued to be honest. Maintaining dynasty TE1 will be tough and I’m concerned about that offense after the current OC leaves (back for 1 more year, could be gone after for a HC gig)
Posted by Bonjourno
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2010
2713 posts
Posted on 5/22/24 at 8:42 pm to
Starting spots: 1 QB, 3 WR, 2 RB, 1 TE, 1 Flex (includes TE)

Herbert, Cousins, Purdy
Kyren, Achane, Jacobs, Pierce, Warren, McLaughlin
Chase, Waddle, Meyers, Tre Tucker, M Thomas
Ferguson, Taysom

I don’t mind selling high on Achane either. I’m unbalanced RB depth compared to WR. Don’t trust Achane health wise and long term


Posted by WuShock
Metairie
Member since Aug 2018
1324 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 11:22 am to
I would definitely hold onto Chase with this roster. You don't have another WR1 on your roster, and for a 3WR league, you're holding onto a top 3 asset. Laporta is probably around 20 right now, but I don't feel like the other stuff in the trade makes up that gap.
Posted by tigers32
Member since Mar 2012
5637 posts
Posted on 5/23/24 at 4:21 pm to
Yeah, I still prefer Chase based off your roster. LaPorta may be enticing, but Reed and the 1.10 wouldn’t be enough to make me consider that deal.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram