Started By
Message

Initial Jobless claims 208k today

Posted on 5/2/24 at 6:06 pm
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74027 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 6:06 pm
So after 6 weeks of it being exactly 215k, last week intial claims dropped to 208k now this week its exactly 208k again

Contuining claims came in exactly at 1.774 again

This is statisically impossible

Danielle DiMartino says the BLS is straight up lying

Do we think there will be a blowout BLS # tomorrow?

Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40611 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 6:22 pm to
US government agencies are incredibly lazy with their bullshite statistics. A good bullshitter will at least throw in some variance.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74027 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:13 pm to
The best part was the MSM was starting to call out that 215k number then it dropped to 208k
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40611 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 7:46 pm to
The USDA will do “forecasts” where they keep some numbers exactly the same for like ten years. Not very helpful.
Posted by roadkill
East Coast, FL
Member since Oct 2008
1844 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

This is statisically impossible


Everything the FedGov says is a lie - every department is corrupt and they rely on a sycophant corrupt media to propagate their lies.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85084 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 1:01 am to
quote:

This is statisically impossible


No it’s not, and you’re the one making up numbers. It was 5/6 weeks at 212k, and that was only the seasonally adjusted numbers. The state by state variation and the non-seasonally adjusted numbers were much different.

Also, the last time a similar streak happened was under Trump, but I don’t recall the claims of BLS making things up back then.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 1:17 am
Posted by FLObserver
Jacksonville
Member since Nov 2005
14479 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 3:54 am to
No way Biden lets anything slip too bad until election. I mean after all inflation is definitely under control and he has the nation on the right track.
Posted by roadkill
East Coast, FL
Member since Oct 2008
1844 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 7:30 am to
quote:

inflation is definitely under control


*transitory
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74027 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 7:41 am to
quote:

No it’s not, and you’re the one making up numbers


How am I making up numbers


175k jobs today well below expecations
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85084 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:05 am to
quote:

How am I making up number


Your OP was false. It wasn’t 6 straight weeks of the same number and you also had the number wrong.

Seems pretty obvious you made it up.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74027 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:16 am to
Im sorry it was 212k not 215k. Cry all you want. You even bring up Trump



quote:

The last 13 weeks of initial unemployment claims. It finally moved off 212k, but barely. Again, we are a $30 trillion economy with over 160 million workers. Unemployment insurance is a state program, meaning there are 50 states with 50 rules, 50 different ways to sign up, and 50 websites. Filling out these forms takes work. That alone should give a variability of more than a thousand or two a week. Unemployment insurance is highly seasonal; little things like a holiday on the week make a difference (see around Feb 16, President's Day, and March 29, Easter). Yet, given all this, these numbers barely move. I'm not accusing anyone of anything. Rather I would like someone from the BLS (who collects the data, seasonally adjusts it, and releases it) to offer an explanation for the lack of volatility.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85084 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Im sorry it was 212k not 215k.


And it wasn’t 6 straight weeks.

quote:

You even bring up Trump


I pointed out the last time we saw very little movement on the numbers was during his term, but I don’t recall any accusations of just making it up around here.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74027 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:22 am to
quote:

And it wasn’t 6 straight weeks


Yeah it was like 11 weeks
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85084 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Yeah it was like 11 weeks


See, like I said, making up numbers.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74027 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 8:58 am to
K
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84192 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 9:46 am to
quote:

And it wasn’t 6 straight weeks.



5 of 6. But still, 5 of 6 weeks with the exact same number isn't statistically very improbable? And I just went through the 4 years of Trump, and I'm not seeing any 6 week times that look similar to that .
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85084 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 10:03 am to
quote:

And I just went through the 4 years of Trump, and I'm not seeing any 6 week times that look similar to that .


7/15/17-8/19/17

245k
249k
245k
254k
245k
245k

Also had a 245k on 6/10. 4 of 6 weeks were the same, and the next week was 247k, a 2k difference.

ETA- the culprit in both cases is the extreme smoothing that seasonality factors create. The raw numbers are as volatile as you’d expect them, but seasonality is designed to smooth things out the same way levelized utility billing does.
This post was edited on 5/3/24 at 10:24 am
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
74027 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 10:12 am to
quote:

But still, 5 of 6 weeks with the exact same number isn't statistically very improbable?


According to slackster it is cause Trump
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85084 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 10:21 am to
quote:

According to slackster it is cause Trump


You’ve proven multiple times on this board that your ability to reason and/or think critically is nil, so I’m not terribly surprised you’re having such a hard time with this one.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84192 posts
Posted on 5/3/24 at 10:37 am to
Your response is one time where the numbers were the same week to week
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram