- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/16/24 at 7:43 am to NorthTiger
Just know one thing - the prosecutor is not looking for justice. The prosecutor is looking for a win and has no problems abusing the law to get there.
Most judges are former prosecutors. The deck is already stacked.
Most judges are former prosecutors. The deck is already stacked.
Posted on 5/16/24 at 9:02 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
believe that the FF made a mistake by declaring a jury trial an inalienable right. I don't believe that anything can be an inalienable right that requires compelling someone else's labor in order for you to exercise it. And that's reason #1 that I am a proponent of professional juries.
I left this experience when bering the same thing. My trial had to do with risk assessment in a medical setting. I just so happen to have much experience in that.
In this situation i thought the (short) deliberation was guided more by emotional that reason, logic and the testimony.
I left there thinking maybe we do need professional juries
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News