- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Legal question for fun - Boebart and her Beetlejuice handy
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:28 am to SuperSaint
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:28 am to SuperSaint
impressive. even more impressive, considering the effort involved to hide a touch of pissiness with that sarcasm
C
C
This post was edited on 9/24/23 at 9:31 am
1
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:33 am to AtlantaLSUfan
quote:
It wasn’t a handy. The 2 second clip lS the entire controversy. He grabbed her, she grabbed him back. Then the media and sensationalism took over to make it seem that this was just the beginning. Nope, that was the entire exchange. Then they watched the movie
If they were thinking about feeling each other up in the theater then it probably would have been prudent not to draw attention to themselves beforehand by acting like assholes in public.
This post was edited on 9/24/23 at 9:34 am
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:37 am to SixthAndBarone
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:38 am to Klark Kent
Boebart takes photos with guns and tweets about groomers so my comrade, she's above being called out for acting like a couple of 14yos sitting on the last row in an AMC watching Fast and Furious Stick Shift
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:40 am to redstick13
To me, it looks like when the person behind her said something about her blowing a vape cloud, boebart was trying to annoy this person in the subsequent clips. Like "frick this bitch. She thinks I'm annoying, ill show her annoying, does she know who I am?"
Trashy as fk, but boebart hadn't done anything in the past to make anyone belive she wasn't. This whole thing is of no consequence and has gotten way too many clicks. I dont understand the people who are flabbergasted at this and I understand the people willing to die for her honor even less.
Trashy as fk, but boebart hadn't done anything in the past to make anyone belive she wasn't. This whole thing is of no consequence and has gotten way too many clicks. I dont understand the people who are flabbergasted at this and I understand the people willing to die for her honor even less.
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:40 am to SixthAndBarone
How can she claim that she had a reasonable expectation of privacy when there’s other people sitting all around her? Even with the theater lights out, there’s still enough light for people a couple seats away to see whats going on
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:45 am to POTUS2024
quote:
It's a public space.
pubic space
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:46 am to GRTiger
quote:
think it's pretty obvious she had this expectation
I think much more likely - was hammered enough that she didn’t really care
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:48 am to SixthAndBarone
quote:
It's a public space.
Which is why I put “when the lights were out” in bold…
Holy frick you're stupid. If you're in a large room, say a theatre, with other people, that means that you're in public. It doesn't matter if the lights are at maximum brightness, what matters is if other people are around. That's the distinction that you're missing.
Private is when you're by yourself or with another person. Public is when there are more people around.
Quit trying to justify her trashy behavior; she's not going to frick you.
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:49 am to TigerinKorea
quote:
She still has the moral high ground.
Surely, you're kidding right? Dude, I don't do Moral Relativism, okay.
I come from a generation where we liked our women alluring, mysterious, virtuous, and inviting. I married a woman like that. You should too. They're out there, still.
This post was edited on 9/24/23 at 10:04 am
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:50 am to marcus3000
quote:
she's not going to frick you.
Hold on now, we don't know that. She's been around as much as the town bicycle.
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:51 am to SixthAndBarone
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:52 am to SixthAndBarone
quote:
Could you make a case that she had the expectation of privacy when the lights were off, or at least, the expectation of not being seen?
They weren't doing anything illegal, so this would be an interesting case. Maybe the theater needs it for security purposes, but releasing it to the public is a different issue.
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:55 am to TigerinKorea
quote:
She still has the moral high ground.
The funniest thing about this is had she just apologized for the incident, the theater would’ve never released the full video of her going full on trailer park. They were actually trying to do her a solid by not releasing all of the info.
Instead, she tried to deny she was being a shitass and played it off as she was kicked out for singing along and being too loud.
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:56 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
They weren't doing anything illegal, so this would be an interesting case. Maybe the theater needs it for security purposes, but releasing it to the public is a different issue.
Do tell, what law in the state of Colorado did they break by releasing the video? They’re in a public establishment. The lights turned down low doesn’t suddenly create some expectation of privacy when you’re surrounded by other patrons in a public setting.
This post was edited on 9/24/23 at 9:59 am
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:58 am to SixthAndBarone
...more than that, It's a private business. When you enter a private business, you adhere to their rule (No Shirts, No Shoes, etc.)
Posted on 9/24/23 at 10:01 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
They weren't doing anything illegal, so this would be an interesting case. Maybe the theater needs it for security purposes, but releasing it to the public is a different issue.
they weren’t at Woodstock, baw
Posted on 9/24/23 at 10:01 am to nealnan8
quote:
more than that, It's a private business. When you enter a private business, you adhere to their rule
Correct. But is there a rule that says you’re on infrared camera? Their rule cannot be to take up skirt photos of you and then release the photos. So the question is, can their rule be that they will have infrared cameras and release the photos?
I think there’s no legal standing but I’m curious to see how it would play out since it’s infrared cameras.
Posted on 9/24/23 at 10:04 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
Maybe the theater needs it for security purposes, but releasing it to the public is a different issue.
Correct. The question is do you expect not to be filmed by infrared camera when the lights are off? The issue is whether or not you can release the pictures, not whether or not she did anything wrong.
As I said before, you cannot take pictures in a public bathroom because even though it’s public, you have an expectation of privacy. So do you have an expectation of privacy From infrared cameras not people next to you when the lights are turned off?
Posted on 9/24/23 at 10:05 am to SixthAndBarone
quote:
Could you make a case that she had the expectation of privacy when the lights were off, or at least, the expectation of not being seen?
Of course. When I go to an NBA game and they're announcing the home team, I just pull it out and start jacking off. I mean the lights are off.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News