- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 1/21/24 at 2:39 am to MoarKilometers
quote:
Except for a breathalyzer, urinalysis, or blood test
Yea after watching the video this doesn't fit the title really, I mean he didn't refuse to blow just for the hell of it
That said cop really pissed me off at the beginning with the whole "nice truck......expensive truck"comment. Really showed where his head was at and what he was thinking's.
He very well may have been guilty, refusing is definitely suspect but I swear sometimes cops just can't help themselves from being douch bags
This post was edited on 1/21/24 at 2:40 am
Posted on 1/21/24 at 2:43 am to MoarKilometers
quote:
Except for a breathalyzer, urinalysis, or blood test
Sorry I don’t think people should be subjected to this kind of crap so the Karens at MADD can feel false security.
Posted on 1/21/24 at 9:37 am to MoarKilometers
quote:
Except for a breathalyzer, urinalysis, or blood test
For the sake of argument: The charge would be driving under the influence or impaired driving. If the roadside sobriety tests showed he was not impaired, what do the results of any other testing matter?
I would think an alcoholic or other substance addict can operate normally even beyond the legal limits of those substances. Where is the evidence his driving was impaired?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News