Started By
Message

re: How much wealth do you need to join the 1% club in your country?

Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:00 pm to
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
4963 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:00 pm to
Why would I lie about something I’m so proud of? I grew up working at a gas station and now make more than most of America. What is unfair, is the accumulation of wealth due to incomplete information from the public sector. The government should not pick and choose which citizen gets to take loopholes versus which do do not.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31618 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Private sector is ok public is not



i agree but the issue isnt taxes its insider trading. that we can agree needs to stop now. no more investing other than giant mutual funds if you go into public service. goes for spouses too.
This post was edited on 2/29/24 at 12:01 pm
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
4963 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:01 pm to
If a homeless crackhead studied how to weld an airplane through public information like YouTube, or Google, would you trust them to repair a plane that you fly in? No, you wouldn’t because there is some expectation that information that is not public is more valuable or access seeing that information through structure classes Would help you understand better
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
31341 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:01 pm to
No offense, but morons like you and Elizabeth Warren need to be saved from themselves and their terrible fricking ideas. A "wealth tax" would destroy the middle class (I know that's the goal of the progressives, but that's a different thread).

An example:

Someone owns a couple car dealerships worth $10MM. Every dollar they make is reinvested in the business. But they pay themselves $100k per year to live off of.

They will currently pay taxes on the $100k but with a 1% "wealth tax" they would have to pay an additional $100,000 in taxes per year, the entire amount of their income. So what you'd have every single year for small business owners is people having to liquidate parts of their business just to pay the wealth tax, putting themselves in a worse spot and likely ending many of them.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31618 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

The government should not pick and choose which citizen gets to take loopholes versus which do do not.



they dont

wtf are you talking about?

please give 1 example with the direct loophole aka law that is being used please

i want a very specific example not just i heard BS.
Posted by HouseMom
Member since Jun 2020
1027 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

We also made this recently, we don’t have accumulation


Unless you went from $0.00 in 2022 to $1 million in 2023, how on earth would you not have "accumulation" yet?
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31618 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

If a homeless crackhead studied how to weld an airplane through public information like YouTube, or Google, would you trust them to repair a plane that you fly in? No, you wouldn’t because there is some expectation that information that is not public is more valuable or access seeing that information through structure classes Would help you understand better



the whole tax code is public...there is not secret tax code...wtf are you talking about?

how can you be this dumb and make the kind of money you claim? its mindblowing
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
4963 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:03 pm to
Bail bonds. Rich people are allowed to make bail, whereas poor people who do not afford the same level of wealth cannot afford to post. This is an example of government deciding that wealthier people are OK to get away with crimes and see more freedom than poor people
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31618 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Bail bonds. Rich people are allowed to make bail, whereas poor people who do not afford the same level of wealth cannot afford to post. This is an example of government deciding that wealthier people are OK to get away with crimes and see more freedom than poor people



what?

name the law that says you have to have a certain income to get a bail bondsman to bail you out

you have no clue how bail bonds work do you?

A) the judge sets bail based on the charge #1, then based of the flight risk. those with considerable assets and that are deemed a flight risk have higher bail

B) in general the bail for most crimes is pretty consistent across the board unless you are a flight risk or a danger to the public

C) a bailbondsman is a private entity that is most cases requires 10% of the bail up front and he ensures you will show up at court using equity and assets of his as collateral with the court to ensure you do show up.

there is no law saying you must make a certain income or have a certain amount of wealth to use a bail bondsman

again...how the frick are you this dumb?
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
4963 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:11 pm to
The concept went over your head let me dump it down for you. Poor people cannot post bail as often as rich people can. Government is select Levy choosing rich people to be able to post bail by setting it as a financial amount set amount not relative to a persons, income or wealth. This is why a lot of the rich people who are charged, do not spend much time in jail before the verdict is made, whereas a bunch of young lower income people spent much more time in jail, even if they are found to be innocent.
Posted by HouseMom
Member since Jun 2020
1027 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

No, you wouldn’t because there is some expectation that information that is not public is more valuable


A. Information is information whether it's learning about the tax code or working as a mechanic. In fact, I think you could learn the vast majority of med school topics online. The internet is actually pretty amazing.

B. Please give me an example of part of our tax code that is not public.
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
4963 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:12 pm to
On your second point where it says tax code is not public, seeing the tax code, and made public and interpreting the tax code are too very different things. The tax code may say something, but it could be interpreted in various ways that an accountant with experience would be able to tell versus someone reading it for the first time. Also there is value in time someone having to spend all their time reading up on the Bajillion lines of tax code could be utilizing that to make his life better in other methods. Rich people do not have to make those choices.
Posted by mastersleestak
Foul's Creche
Member since Dec 2014
403 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

he has 0 income since retired, only collects dividend income


That sounds like income.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31618 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

The concept went over your head let me dump it down for you. Poor people cannot post bail as often as rich people can. Government is select Levy choosing rich people to be able to post bail by setting it as a financial amount set amount not relative to a persons, income or wealth. This is why a lot of the rich people who are charged, do not spend much time in jail before the verdict is made, whereas a bunch of young lower income people spent much more time in jail, even if they are found to be innocent.




no it didnt go over my head

so poor person makes poor decisions throughout life....makes another poor decision and gets arrested. he is told, you can get out today if you put up this much....but because he makes poor decisions throughout his life he doesnt have the money


so now the government is picking winners and losers based on that?

again how can you be this damn stupid.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31618 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

On your second point where it says tax code is not public, seeing the tax code, and made public and interpreting the tax code are too very different things. The tax code may say something, but it could be interpreted in various ways that an accountant with experience would be able to tell versus someone reading it for the first time. Also there is value in time someone having to spend all their time reading up on the Bajillion lines of tax code could be utilizing that to make his life better in other methods. Rich people do not have to make those choices.



not even close to true and so how little you understand taxes

87% of the country uses the standard deduction because they dont have the write offs to use anything else. It doesnt take a very experienced accountant to figure this out

and unless you own a super complicated business you dont need one of the best accountants either.

you literally sounds dumber and dumber with every single post. its quite baffling actually.
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
4963 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:18 pm to
And who determined what are considered write offs and what aren’t? That is the issue it is subjective and more likely to be accessed by rich people versus poor. I’ve heard that you can write off a plane which sounds crazy to me but you can.
Posted by HouseMom
Member since Jun 2020
1027 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Rich people do not have to make those choices.


Okay, then I think your wife should give $550k of her $650k split evenly between 5 custodians at her hospital every year. That will leave the two of you $100k just from her income, and you'll still have yours.

After all, they don't have the same opportunities the two of you do. I think this is the best way. You're really making too much, and it's just not fair to everyone else. You have some special power to know stuff, and not everyone can compete. I mean, to be gifted with intelligence AND make all that money? Your wife should be ashamed of herself.

And why did y'all buy a house? Poor people can't do that so neither should you.
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
4963 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:21 pm to
I welcome being taxed proportionate to our wealth versus our income
This post was edited on 2/29/24 at 12:21 pm
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
31618 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

And who determined what are considered write offs and what aren’t? That is the issue it is subjective and more likely to be accessed by rich people versus poor. I’ve heard that you can write off a plane which sounds crazy to me but you can.



why wouldnt you be able to depreciate the asset if its being used for the business? its an expense occurred to the business.

should you not be able to do the same with a car that is used for the business?
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
4963 posts
Posted on 2/29/24 at 12:22 pm to
But why is business expense tax deductible? How can we know that it’s truly used for business purposes? The politicians who made these rules can they be bought by business? That’s why it’s unfair.
This post was edited on 2/29/24 at 12:22 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram