- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Open fields doctrine is being challenged in Louisiana
Posted on 3/12/24 at 11:41 am to Sparetime
Posted on 3/12/24 at 11:41 am to Sparetime
quote:
LEOs are all bad, and while we are at it, let's change this rule and that rule to limit their powers to serve and protect...
If you changed "serve and protect", to "infringe on your individual rights".. I'd 100% agree.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 1:00 pm to Sparetime
quote:
This is a liberal agenda dream come true to have "open field" overturned.
I think we found another wildlife agent...
Posted on 3/12/24 at 3:31 pm to SoFla Tideroller
quote:
Yes, liberals are well known for wanting the power of government curtailed...
Read my post, I never mentioned government, I clearly stated law enforcement to protect and serve power.
Posted on 3/12/24 at 3:57 pm to BruslyTiger
quote:
I think we found another wildlife agent...
Nope. Landowner
I might question why he is checking my property twice in two weeks, but I would thank him for being visible on my property.
Now, I'm not doing anything illegal and I've needed them to catch outlaws way more than they have invaded my privacy.
Maybe we should be saying "I think we found another outlaw"
Posted on 3/13/24 at 7:00 am to Sparetime
Does the legislative branch of the government not write law that the enforcement officers use to “serve and protect”?
I’ve always followed the law and my interactions with game wardens have been fine outside of a few power trippers.
You may be fine with them having free range on your private property, but it goes against one of the foundational principles of our free country.
I’ve always followed the law and my interactions with game wardens have been fine outside of a few power trippers.
You may be fine with them having free range on your private property, but it goes against one of the foundational principles of our free country.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 10:03 am to Sparetime
quote:I bet I could find something.
Now, I'm not doing anything illegal
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:30 pm to boudinman
You’re just making another excuse to enter someone’s private property. Nothing you or the state do will affect CWD so spare us the civil servant “I’m just trying to help yall” routine.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 2:24 pm to White Bear
quote:
Now, I'm not doing anything illegal
I bet I could find something.
With the ways laws are written, I bet I could find almost every person doing something. The thing is it doesn't grant law enforcement the right to enter my property without cause or warrant, whether it is a home, the curtilage of a home or open property.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 4:11 pm to SoFla Tideroller
"Yes, liberals are well known for wanting the power of government curtailed..."
They used to be. Classical liberalism included all of the bill of rights and cherished individual freedom. Classical liberalism is dead. Now we live in an upside down world where being liberal means you want a nanny state and hate free speech and think the 2d amendment is outdated and the right to petition for grievances applies only to certain supposedly oppressed groups.
They used to be. Classical liberalism included all of the bill of rights and cherished individual freedom. Classical liberalism is dead. Now we live in an upside down world where being liberal means you want a nanny state and hate free speech and think the 2d amendment is outdated and the right to petition for grievances applies only to certain supposedly oppressed groups.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News