- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hailey Van Lith says negative LSU comments fueled by racism
Posted on 3/31/24 at 2:28 pm to DamnStrong1860
Posted on 3/31/24 at 2:28 pm to DamnStrong1860
I agree with Mulkey that it's more sexist, not racist.
Posted on 3/31/24 at 2:37 pm to clamdip
quote:It's both.
I agree with Mulkey that it's more sexist, not racist.
Posted on 3/31/24 at 3:26 pm to clamdip
quote:
I agree with Mulkey that it's more sexist, not racist.
I think its more about jackass writer who had a hissy fit about LSU and used whatever means to paint LSU as the Sith.
Posted on 4/1/24 at 8:49 am to clamdip
quote:
agree with Mulkey that it's more sexist, not racist.
Nope
If it was sexist rather than racist, then Iowa and Caitlin Clark would be getting the same reaction that Angel Reese and LSU are getting. They’re not.
Posted on 4/1/24 at 11:57 am to clamdip
The portrayal of LSU WBB players in the LA Times was more than just a case of sexism or raceism. It was written by a “professional” writer and approved all the way up the editorial chain of command and then published. Because of the language used to characterize these players it crosses into the area of defamation of character. I do not think it would be hard to hold the LA Times or the writer accountable with a defamation suit from LSU or the women on the team. Just saying.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News