Started By
Message

re: Hailey Van Lith says negative LSU comments fueled by racism

Posted on 3/31/24 at 2:28 pm to
Posted by clamdip
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Sep 2004
17966 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 2:28 pm to
I agree with Mulkey that it's more sexist, not racist.
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
5582 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

I agree with Mulkey that it's more sexist, not racist.
It's both.
Posted by Chrome
Chromeville
Member since Nov 2007
10379 posts
Posted on 3/31/24 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

I agree with Mulkey that it's more sexist, not racist.


I think its more about jackass writer who had a hissy fit about LSU and used whatever means to paint LSU as the Sith.
Posted by cbree88
South Louisiana
Member since Feb 2010
5522 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 8:49 am to
quote:

agree with Mulkey that it's more sexist, not racist.


Nope

If it was sexist rather than racist, then Iowa and Caitlin Clark would be getting the same reaction that Angel Reese and LSU are getting. They’re not.
Posted by texastigerr
Texas
Member since Jan 2005
8311 posts
Posted on 4/1/24 at 11:57 am to
The portrayal of LSU WBB players in the LA Times was more than just a case of sexism or raceism. It was written by a “professional” writer and approved all the way up the editorial chain of command and then published. Because of the language used to characterize these players it crosses into the area of defamation of character. I do not think it would be hard to hold the LA Times or the writer accountable with a defamation suit from LSU or the women on the team. Just saying.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram