Started By
Message

re: What happened during UCONN IOWA?

Posted on 4/6/24 at 10:59 am to
Posted by TigerFan91
:red:
Member since Jan 2005
27248 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 10:59 am to
Because literally no one would care if it wasn’t called because similar screens were probably set all game without a whistle
This post was edited on 4/6/24 at 11:00 am
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
22825 posts
Posted on 4/6/24 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Because literally no one would care if it wasn’t called because similar screens were probably set all game without a whistle


The correct answer is to call the other illegal screens as fouls.

Would people be ok with a game winning shot being completely facilitated by a player tackling the shooter’s defender? No. That is effectively what happened, but people are either just completely biased for wanting a specific team to win.

Also UCONN knows the play was illegal. So they took the chance the ref would choose not to call it and that was their choice. They can not be mad because the correct call was made. They could have either excited the play correctly or ran a different play to get the shot they wanted.

It is like when football offense run a run play and they get caught for an illegal pick play. The offense knows there is a risk they could screw it up, but they do it anyways.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram