Started By
Message

re: Powell: Fed can maintain higher rates for "as long as needed"

Posted on 4/17/24 at 11:23 am to
Posted by Wishnitwas1998
where TN, MS, and AL meet
Member since Oct 2010
58418 posts
Posted on 4/17/24 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Its not that high when you could buy a nice house for $80k Basically every expense has outpaced earnings. A decent house in many areas is $200-$300k, sometimes more than that. Even a 7.5% mortgage on that is prohibitive to the average earner.


But higher rates are how you in theory get housing back to a more affordable level. The rates lower demand which then lowers prices

Notice I said "in theory". As others have mentioned there's a lot of things going on in this economy that have tested that theory. I do argue though if you raised rates high enough inflation would stop, the question becomes how high would you have to go and how much other damage would you do to the economy in the process?
Posted by Longhorn Actual
Member since Dec 2023
966 posts
Posted on 4/17/24 at 11:45 am to
quote:

But higher rates are how you in theory get housing back to a more affordable level. The rates lower demand which then lowers prices



That only addresses the demand side and assumes stable/adequate supply.

We have a supply side problem as well that needs to be addressed. The catch is, higher rates means higher cost of capital for builders - meaning it's more financially difficult to increase supply. That increase in CoC goes where? In general terms, costs translate to price (companies might eat a little bit of margin, but they have to remain profitable).

The tension between the supply side and demand side is pretty clear. It's a trick bag without a clear way to get out of without something breaking.

Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
2373 posts
Posted on 4/17/24 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

But higher rates are how you in theory get housing back to a more affordable level. The rates lower demand which then lowers prices



But a house is by far most people's largest investment. So you're teetering between having a chunk of the population not be able to afford a house vs the other chunk being in an upside-down asset. And when houses do become more affordable you're gonna have investors snatching them up as rentals again.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram