- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Jinx: Part 2
Posted on 4/22/24 at 1:00 am to GeauxldMember
Posted on 4/22/24 at 1:00 am to GeauxldMember
I’m struggling to understand what could have possibly been interesting enough (after he basically confessed on camera) to warrant a second season. Loved the first one though
Posted on 4/22/24 at 11:31 am to VinegarStrokes
Agree that there didn't seem to be much left on the cutting room floor after the first go 'round.
I was way late to the party in watching the first version of this, but I loved the Gosling/Dunst movie about it.
Also, for any Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt fans, I didn't realize how spot-on Armisen's Durst was. Especially the "ok, bye-bye" he ended his convos with.
I was way late to the party in watching the first version of this, but I loved the Gosling/Dunst movie about it.
Also, for any Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt fans, I didn't realize how spot-on Armisen's Durst was. Especially the "ok, bye-bye" he ended his convos with.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 12:05 pm to VinegarStrokes
quote:
I’m struggling to understand what could have possibly been interesting enough (after he basically confessed on camera) to warrant a second season.
Maybe just Robert Durst. I could probably just watch him sitting on the couch watching tv and be entertained for a while. Such a strange creature, it'd be like watching some weird zoo animal. But I do think the New Orleans stuff and his death (obviously) were after the 1st season. I don't know if they filmed anything new with him after the 1st season, but they probably had enough footage they didn't use that along with more interviews with people who knew him could make it compelling enough to watch.
The guy who produced it--and is in it as the interviewer/narrator--also produced Capturing the Friedmans and couple of other things, so he's clearly a good filmmaker. I'm sure he's made something good enough to watch, though it was likely much more of a cash grab than that he really just felt like there was more story to tell. I'm sure after Durst died, HBO called him (the producer, Andrew Jarecki) up and said, "Hey, we've got all this extra Durst footage that we never used, now that he's dead, you think if we give you a few million--'YES! Absolutely!!!!'--you could put together a couple of new episodes for a Season 2 to close his story/life out?"
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News