- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
It’s hard to categorize Shailene Woodley.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:04 am
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:04 am
quote:
UPDATED Babe Image Rules: Images should not contain the following:
Nudity or strategically covered nudity
Sheer or see-through clothing
Lewd or provocative poses
Sexually explicit acts
Close-ups of breasts, buttocks, or crotches
Also, threads that contain acceptable babe images should have "NSFW"
(Not Safe For Work) in the title.
Do not post copyrighted images or images that are not part of the public domain.
Do not link to acceptable images that originate from porn sites or sites that contain adult content. We suggest you use an image hosting site to host your image before posting them here.
Your posting privileges will be suspended if you fail to follow these simple rules. Thanks for your cooperation.
I was watching a movie called Adrift this weekend. Shailene Woodley is in it.
Some scenes she was cute, some scenes she was a butterface and some scenes had me just looking at her legs.
She’s cute, but she’s not. She’s got great legs, but they look skinny. She’s got a nice body but she’s got no curves. She’s attractive but she’s not.
It’s weird.
This post was edited on 4/22/24 at 7:06 am
15
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:05 am to carhartt
Not really, she’s very good looking. But also very insane.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:05 am to carhartt
Her face is a hard 6 at best. Move along, folks.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:14 am to carhartt
She looks dirty. Would for sure, but she’s def middle of the pack vs other celebs.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:17 am to carhartt
What is there to categorize? She’s a tall, slim, good looking woman.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:17 am to carhartt
All I know is I would suck on those legs for days.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:18 am to carhartt
Category: Wood
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:18 am to carhartt
She's lost some her good looks in the past 5 or so years. That liberal entitlement complex really takes a toll on a woman's looks.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:23 am to carhartt
I Woodley for sure. She doesn't have that plastic look, which is rare.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:26 am to carhartt
Damn, she’s lost too much weight.
Also she’s a very mildly attractive woman who you wouldn’t look at twice in real life.
She’s also got flappy titties.
Also she’s a very mildly attractive woman who you wouldn’t look at twice in real life.
She’s also got flappy titties.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:31 am to carhartt
She's cute with a nice body legs and feet.
Whats wrong with her?
Whats wrong with her?
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:43 am to carhartt
Looks like she smells something bad.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 7:56 am to carhartt
She needs to keep the hair style in pic 1
Posted on 4/22/24 at 8:25 am to carhartt
Poor man's Jennifer Lawrence. (ETA dammitt AUFANATL)
And if she was 'engaged' to Aaron Rogers, she's probably a lesbian too.
And if she was 'engaged' to Aaron Rogers, she's probably a lesbian too.
This post was edited on 4/22/24 at 8:28 am
Posted on 4/22/24 at 8:32 am to carhartt
quote:
She’s cute, but she’s not. She’s got great legs, but they look skinny. She’s got a nice body but she’s got no curves. She’s attractive but she’s not.
The best description of her ever conceived.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 9:16 am to carhartt
quote:I'd categorize with a hard.
It’s hard to categorize Shailene Woodley.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News