Started By
Message

re: In case you missed the other lebron not-clutch threads: rant on the refs and pout fest lol

Posted on 4/25/24 at 8:03 am to
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
6846 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 8:03 am to
quote:

threads like this just prove that the throne has been threatened and people can’t handle it

No one wastes time doing these threads for Jokic, Steph, KD, etc

Exactly. It's so transparent

Jordan is now in the middle when it comes to rings and stats. Russell has him on rings, Lebron has him on stats. Peak Jordan was amazing, but Lebron's longevity is undeniable. 40,000 points, 10,000 rebounds, and 10,000 assists is nuts.
Hell, noone else has 30k/10k/10k

Lebron at 39 was a more efficient scorer than prime Jordan. Lebron shot 54% FG% this year, Jordan's highest was 53.8%.

I'd still take prime Jordan all day, but that's a wild stat.
This post was edited on 4/25/24 at 8:09 am
Posted by Dantheman504
N/A
Member since Jun 2013
3636 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 8:10 am to
OR.... Hear me out

MAYBE everyone knows the Refs/ league help him every year for the past 5 or so years AFTER he created super teams to have a better chance of winning a championships for years.

AND still bitches about how he's somehow always at a disadvantage or its someons else's fault.

He changed the league for worse, only cares about himself, and is generally a shite person/ role model.
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
48068 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 8:13 am to
What’s transparent is guys like you being so emotional about him that you’re able to convince yourselves of ridiculous ideas like “Lebron is the only player to ever be criticized”. Think about how ridiculous that is.
Posted by Stan Switek
Member since Apr 2017
367 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Lebron at 39 was a more efficient scorer than prime Jordan. Lebron shot 54% FG% this year, Jordan's highest was 53.8%.

I'd still take prime Jordan all day, but that's a wild stat.


It's really not all that wild. In the 1997-98 season (the year they started keeping stats of shot distances), Jordan shot 24% of his shots from inside 10 feet. James this season shot 66.2% of his shots from inside 10 feet. Comparing those years, Jordan shot 49.2% from 10-16 feet whereas James is shooting 31.3%.

James simply takes a lot more shots close to the basket than Jordan did.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram