- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would the 1999 Bulls four-peated if the core came back?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:26 pm to Green Eggs 88
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:26 pm to Green Eggs 88
Pacers probably beats the Bulls if they met in the playoffs that year.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 2:08 pm to prplhze2000
Wasn’t Drexler only there for 95? I’m pretty sure. With just Dream, Bulls beat them in 94. My question was does Drexler even consider Houston if they don’t win in 94.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 2:10 pm to Basura Blanco
quote:Allowed lol? He told Krause to do it, so he would be the bad guy. Dorf was cheap.
As owner, I would say he was all to blame. He had arguably the greatest player and the greatest coach in NBA history and he allowed his GM to essentially fire/retire them both before the '98 season even started.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 5:31 pm to Wally Sparks
quote:nobody screwed up anything. they dont have infinite money to pay these guys. it's easy to say just pay when it's not your money.
Reinsdorf was just as much to blame.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 6:08 pm to Green Eggs 88
Yes especially on a stroke shorten season Absolutely
Posted on 4/26/24 at 6:19 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
Kerr would have still been with the Bulls and not the Spurs, who won it all that year.
Kerr avg 9 mpg and 2 ppg in the playoffs. He didn’t even play every game. Spurs only lost 2 playoff games that year. They may have lost to Chicago, but Kerr wasn’t going to be the difference. 2003 Kerr was a different story.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:06 pm to Green Eggs 88
quote:they would have 4 peated if Jordan hadnt retired the first time to play baseball, maybe 5 or 6 peated. That's the crazy thing about Jordan, he had by far the best and most successful prime of any player ever, and that's without 2.5 years of it
Would the 1999 Bulls four-peated if the core came back?
This post was edited on 4/26/24 at 8:07 pm
Posted on 4/26/24 at 8:58 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
what’s “barely”
Did you watch the Last Dance?
Why do you think it was called that?
They knew going into that season they had one last run in them, the physical toll on the team by the time they finished off the Jazz was insane
Hell if Jordan doesn’t make that shot and it goes to game 7, who knows
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:48 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
They barely won the last one, they were all spent and running on fumes
They won the championship in 6 games, dumb arse.
And those Pacers were stout that year, so I understand going 7 games that year.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:19 pm to faraway
quote:But there was essentially no cap to pay your own players. Jordan wanted a 2 year, $36 million deal. He instead signed a 1 year $30 million deal. They absolutely had the means to keep the team together for an additional year if they wanted to.
nobody screwed up anything. they dont have infinite money to pay these guys. it's easy to say just pay when it's not your money.
Reinsdorf is one of the worst owners in sports. He just lucked out by pulling Jordan at 3. Look at what he's done to the White Sox. It's worse than Dan Snyder.
Posted on 4/27/24 at 1:04 am to Ostrich
The 8th seed knicks made the finals so they would have met the spurs in the finals. Who knows about that but I would have taken Michael Jordan. The spurs weren’t in full form yet
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News