- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Beatles or Stones?
Posted on 5/10/24 at 7:46 am to SteelerBravesDawg
Posted on 5/10/24 at 7:46 am to SteelerBravesDawg
Andrew Loog Oldham was no slouch either.
Imo, the problem between the two (early Beatles and early Stones), was the engineering. It was like night and day.
The Stones earlier recordings sound like they were recorded in a stairwell, while the Beatles earlier recordings were so clean and clear. Compare songs like "Time Is On My Side" to "I Feel Fine". It's night and day.
Tribute that to their studios and engineering.
Imo, the problem between the two (early Beatles and early Stones), was the engineering. It was like night and day.
The Stones earlier recordings sound like they were recorded in a stairwell, while the Beatles earlier recordings were so clean and clear. Compare songs like "Time Is On My Side" to "I Feel Fine". It's night and day.
Tribute that to their studios and engineering.
This post was edited on 5/10/24 at 7:47 am
1
Posted on 5/10/24 at 9:24 am to hogcard1964
quote:
The Stones earlier recordings sound like they were recorded in a stairwell, while the Beatles earlier recordings were so clean and clear. Compare songs like "Time Is On My Side" to "I Feel Fine". It's night and day.
Tribute that to their studios and engineering.
Yes, if you bought the 45 or especially album.
On AM radio it didn't matter. Fuzzy Mono seemed to work just fine.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News