Started By
Message

re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule

Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:10 am to
Posted by Geauxtigersgeaux12
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2019
2142 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:10 am to
Milazzo should’ve hit him in the back with the ball and it would’ve been called.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
21503 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 10:09 am to
Geauxtigers has the answer, catcher should have hit him in the back with the ball.
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65143 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Milazzo should’ve hit him in the back with the ball and it would’ve been called.
id rather he’d thrown the ball to Jones
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95950 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Milazzo should’ve hit him in the back with the ball and it would’ve been called.
Why not jsut hit your giant first baseman?
Posted by Gee
Member since Aug 2013
41 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 11:54 am to
That’s how my coaches taught me.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram