Started By
Message

Is unlimited eligibility the next issue for the NCAA?

Posted on 5/13/24 at 7:42 am
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
30905 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 7:42 am
Now that the NCAA has been neutered by the courts in basically every case brought against will we see someone challenge eligibility limits and what would the strength of their case be? Could we see guys, like Johni broome, who are really good college players but not projected as pros stay in college for like ten years at a million or so a pop?
Posted by RelentlessTide
Member since Feb 2020
3015 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 7:47 am to
I’ve known a few career students. So if you can’t age out academically, can you age out athletically?
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
16011 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 8:40 am to
quote:

Johni broome, who are really good college players but not projected as pros


He will make a nice living playing basketball.

Maybe not in the NBA, but Europe pays decent for basketball.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25810 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 8:48 am to
Once the players tip over from student athletes to employees, the universities will no longer be able to age discriminate.

It is the slow death of college football.

Ironically, I'd pay money to watch an intramural league of student athletes at that point.
Posted by IamNotaRobot
OKC
Member since Nov 2021
248 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 9:14 am to
Do they offer PhDs in underwater basket weaving?
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
10132 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 9:31 am to
This would actually be a positive.

Kids who are not ready for the NFL will be more likely to stick with a team until they get a chance to perform. Without a finite timeline, they won't be transferring as much to hope to find a better landing spot.

5* right now want to play and be in the NFL in 3 years, so if year 1 looks rough, they start looking around.

3* and 4* might do the math and say "ok, if it takes me 4,5 years to get there, that's ok" and stick with a program.

Big programs won't let a 1* or 2* fumble around for 5+ years but "projects" will get a chance they otherwise wouldn't.
Posted by jb4
Member since Apr 2013
12692 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 10:09 am to
There is no age limit for anybody enrolling in a university
Posted by rtr23242526
Member since Dec 2022
2036 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 10:15 am to
Age out fo sho
Posted by theballguy
Colorado Springs, CO
Member since Oct 2011
2653 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Now that the NCAA has been neutered by the courts in basically every case brought against will we see someone challenge eligibility limits and what would the strength of their case be? Could we see guys, like Johni broome, who are really good college players but not projected as pros stay in college for like ten years at a million or so a pop?



With the way things are? Why not. Bring back AJ McCarron I suppose and Reuben Foster while we're at it. I'm sure they'd love to come back to Tuscaloosa



Posted by DawginSC
Member since Aug 2022
4398 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:53 am to
Sure. Another decade of Stetson Bennett at QB for UGA.
Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
11344 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:03 pm to
I knew a guy at UGA who graduated with his undergrad and masters and had been playing on the club rugby team since he was a HS Jr. His older brother was on the rugby team when he began playing in high school.

Finally by the time he got his graduate degree he stopped playing.

That's 8 years of playing ball, although not NCAA affiliated. If the NCAA is toothless, why can't some career student continue to try to play?
Posted by MrLahey
The Salty Ham
Member since Dec 2013
777 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:11 pm to
Broome isn't projected as a pro player?? Are you high?
Posted by Dawg4Life47
Beach
Member since Sep 2013
8465 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:11 pm to
Years in school and eligibility are two different things.

A la Stetson Bennett.

You get 5 years for undergrad (including redshirt if taken) + 1 year for Grad.

Max is 6 years.
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
14227 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 3:48 pm to
Do that and high school kids would never make it into a program. I don't care how talented a high school kid is, he will not play over 23-30 year old men who have been in a college athletic program for 5-12 years.

In order to admit high school kids, you would also have to allow unlimited rosters.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
45094 posts
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

unlimited eligibility


Once players are deemed employees of the schools, the next step will be to make it where they don't have to be students in good standing. The eligibility issue comes after that, and it seems inevitable.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter