Started By
Message
Is unlimited eligibility the next issue for the NCAA?
Posted on 5/13/24 at 7:42 am
Posted on 5/13/24 at 7:42 am
Now that the NCAA has been neutered by the courts in basically every case brought against will we see someone challenge eligibility limits and what would the strength of their case be? Could we see guys, like Johni broome, who are really good college players but not projected as pros stay in college for like ten years at a million or so a pop?
Posted on 5/13/24 at 7:47 am to RandySavage
I’ve known a few career students. So if you can’t age out academically, can you age out athletically?
Posted on 5/13/24 at 8:40 am to RandySavage
quote:
Johni broome, who are really good college players but not projected as pros
He will make a nice living playing basketball.
Maybe not in the NBA, but Europe pays decent for basketball.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 8:48 am to RandySavage
Once the players tip over from student athletes to employees, the universities will no longer be able to age discriminate.
It is the slow death of college football.
Ironically, I'd pay money to watch an intramural league of student athletes at that point.
It is the slow death of college football.
Ironically, I'd pay money to watch an intramural league of student athletes at that point.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 9:14 am to RandySavage
Do they offer PhDs in underwater basket weaving?
Posted on 5/13/24 at 9:31 am to RandySavage
This would actually be a positive.
Kids who are not ready for the NFL will be more likely to stick with a team until they get a chance to perform. Without a finite timeline, they won't be transferring as much to hope to find a better landing spot.
5* right now want to play and be in the NFL in 3 years, so if year 1 looks rough, they start looking around.
3* and 4* might do the math and say "ok, if it takes me 4,5 years to get there, that's ok" and stick with a program.
Big programs won't let a 1* or 2* fumble around for 5+ years but "projects" will get a chance they otherwise wouldn't.
Kids who are not ready for the NFL will be more likely to stick with a team until they get a chance to perform. Without a finite timeline, they won't be transferring as much to hope to find a better landing spot.
5* right now want to play and be in the NFL in 3 years, so if year 1 looks rough, they start looking around.
3* and 4* might do the math and say "ok, if it takes me 4,5 years to get there, that's ok" and stick with a program.
Big programs won't let a 1* or 2* fumble around for 5+ years but "projects" will get a chance they otherwise wouldn't.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 10:09 am to RandySavage
There is no age limit for anybody enrolling in a university
Posted on 5/13/24 at 10:40 am to RandySavage
quote:
Now that the NCAA has been neutered by the courts in basically every case brought against will we see someone challenge eligibility limits and what would the strength of their case be? Could we see guys, like Johni broome, who are really good college players but not projected as pros stay in college for like ten years at a million or so a pop?
With the way things are? Why not. Bring back AJ McCarron I suppose and Reuben Foster while we're at it. I'm sure they'd love to come back to Tuscaloosa
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:53 am to RandySavage
Sure. Another decade of Stetson Bennett at QB for UGA.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:03 pm to RandySavage
I knew a guy at UGA who graduated with his undergrad and masters and had been playing on the club rugby team since he was a HS Jr. His older brother was on the rugby team when he began playing in high school.
Finally by the time he got his graduate degree he stopped playing.
That's 8 years of playing ball, although not NCAA affiliated. If the NCAA is toothless, why can't some career student continue to try to play?
Finally by the time he got his graduate degree he stopped playing.
That's 8 years of playing ball, although not NCAA affiliated. If the NCAA is toothless, why can't some career student continue to try to play?
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:11 pm to RandySavage
Broome isn't projected as a pro player?? Are you high?
Posted on 5/13/24 at 1:11 pm to RandySavage
Years in school and eligibility are two different things.
A la Stetson Bennett.
You get 5 years for undergrad (including redshirt if taken) + 1 year for Grad.
Max is 6 years.
A la Stetson Bennett.
You get 5 years for undergrad (including redshirt if taken) + 1 year for Grad.
Max is 6 years.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 3:48 pm to RandySavage
Do that and high school kids would never make it into a program. I don't care how talented a high school kid is, he will not play over 23-30 year old men who have been in a college athletic program for 5-12 years.
In order to admit high school kids, you would also have to allow unlimited rosters.
In order to admit high school kids, you would also have to allow unlimited rosters.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:00 pm to RandySavage
quote:
unlimited eligibility
Once players are deemed employees of the schools, the next step will be to make it where they don't have to be students in good standing. The eligibility issue comes after that, and it seems inevitable.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News