- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Wisky thinks Tigers Roll
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:51 am
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:51 am
While driving in for game, local radio was handicapping all marquee college games this weekend. All 4 guys on local radio said LSU big over Wisky. One guy said Badgers would not score. Another said LSU would blow out Wisconsin. I was somewhat surprised. Rant opinions?
Posted on 9/2/16 at 3:03 am to Leonides
All kidding aside I say LSU scores 5 touchdowns in the first half
Posted on 9/2/16 at 3:14 am to Leonides
I tend to agree, several key factors that will be an advantage to LSU. One is the decline in Wisconsin offense. Not dealing with same caliber running offense as 2014. And no real "light it up" play makers in passing game. LSU is loaded on defense, and with Aranda's style in bodes very well in the Tigers favor. It will be very interesting to watch the transition to 3-4 scheme though. I think this will take time to truly develop its potential.
Other factor is speed, strength and depth of LSU run game. I know, most will want Harris to light it up with 250 yards passing and 3 TD's but the core strength of this offense is the run. The passing game will be needed in the future, and Harris will need the time to improve/refine his throws (with hopefully more versatile play calling) but I just don't think this game will depend on it. The beginning of the second half, I really believe LSU will pull away because of the power running of the stable of backs. I will be shocked if this game goes any different than LSU with 250 yards rushing and 100-125 yards passing. But we soon shall see! Geaux Tigers!
And BTW, why the heck are we posting on a message board at 3 AM ? LOL
Other factor is speed, strength and depth of LSU run game. I know, most will want Harris to light it up with 250 yards passing and 3 TD's but the core strength of this offense is the run. The passing game will be needed in the future, and Harris will need the time to improve/refine his throws (with hopefully more versatile play calling) but I just don't think this game will depend on it. The beginning of the second half, I really believe LSU will pull away because of the power running of the stable of backs. I will be shocked if this game goes any different than LSU with 250 yards rushing and 100-125 yards passing. But we soon shall see! Geaux Tigers!
And BTW, why the heck are we posting on a message board at 3 AM ? LOL
This post was edited on 9/2/16 at 3:34 am
Posted on 9/2/16 at 4:42 am to Leonides
No, same game as 2 years ago, we pull away late.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 6:07 am to Leonides
We'll have to see, it seems like the local Wisky reporters believe there is a difference in level of team.
Current Wisconsin can't handle current Ohio St, there's a pretty significant difference on the field (or has been the past couple of years). Just as Michigan St couldn't handle Alabama, for the same reasons.
Sounds like they are perceiving that LSU is on the level of Bama and Ohio St, while they think Wisconsin is on the level below.
Whether that turns out to be true, or is just popular opinion, is the million dollar question.
Current Wisconsin can't handle current Ohio St, there's a pretty significant difference on the field (or has been the past couple of years). Just as Michigan St couldn't handle Alabama, for the same reasons.
Sounds like they are perceiving that LSU is on the level of Bama and Ohio St, while they think Wisconsin is on the level below.
Whether that turns out to be true, or is just popular opinion, is the million dollar question.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 7:53 am to Leonides
This game will mirror the OSU championship game. We will see how long it takes until Aranda realizes that he has the cornerbacks to go man up and literally everyone else is in the box.
Don't know what the score will be when Aranda trusts this, but from that point on, LSU rolls.
Don't know what the score will be when Aranda trusts this, but from that point on, LSU rolls.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 8:10 am to Leonides
My biggest concern is the "first game" rust/sluggishness. Although LSU has traditionally played pretty well in neutral/away operners against ranked or power 5 teams we have also struggled a bit in operners against inferior teams (at least in the first half of games) and tend to play down to our competition somewhat.
I really believe Miles and Co. are wanting to make a statement in this game (at least I hope they are) and show the country that LSU is legit and that he can open up the offense and let our superior playmakers loose. If they do I think LSU can get a lead early, go into halftime ahead by a couple TD's and then come out in the 2nd half and punish Wisconsin. I hope we can use the 2nd half to "test" Harris & our WR's ability to take over a game and run wild on the road in a hostile environment against what amounts to a mid-level SEC team.
LSU 41
WISC 23
I really believe Miles and Co. are wanting to make a statement in this game (at least I hope they are) and show the country that LSU is legit and that he can open up the offense and let our superior playmakers loose. If they do I think LSU can get a lead early, go into halftime ahead by a couple TD's and then come out in the 2nd half and punish Wisconsin. I hope we can use the 2nd half to "test" Harris & our WR's ability to take over a game and run wild on the road in a hostile environment against what amounts to a mid-level SEC team.
LSU 41
WISC 23
Posted on 9/2/16 at 8:56 am to Leonides
I think they know that Aranda's and several of their other key starters' loss will be huge. They don't have a proven QB, and their defense matches up poorly against our offense (both in ability and in size). I actually thought the spread would have been a little bigger.
On a side note, I do believe this year may be the Return of the Tigers Defense. I don't know that anyone will match up with our defense, God willing that everyone stays healthy. But that's why games are played, and We Shall See.
On a side note, I do believe this year may be the Return of the Tigers Defense. I don't know that anyone will match up with our defense, God willing that everyone stays healthy. But that's why games are played, and We Shall See.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 12:33 pm to Leonides
If it was 107.5 in GB, none of those guys know crap about UW sports. They know their Packers football but certainly not UW football.
Posted on 9/2/16 at 2:04 pm to Leonides
I'll say again, that these are two different teams from 2014.
Defense
Melvin Gordon vs two first time starting DTs (one a true sophomore, one a true freshman), Welter was the MLB, and there was no Jamal Adams as a run stopper.
Offense
First year starter in true sophomore Jennings who is now at ULL. First year starting and/or playing WRs (a redshirt sophomore, redshirt freshman, and 2 true freshmen). First game for true freshman Fournette, and first game of a new zone blocking scheme ran by the OL.
The situations are just completely different. The Wisconsin passing will be much better, simply because McEvoy isn't the QB , but they lose any running advantage there that they got from the 2014 game. Clement is FAR from Gordon (seriously I don't know a Wisconsin back that matches up), and is about equal to Williams our 3rd string RB. The biggest however, is that we have Aranda now. You don't think that he has lent the LSU offensive staff ideas from stopping the guys he's coached the past 3 years???
ETA: My homer pick is 56-13 LSU win, but my realistic pick is 38-17 LSU win.
Defense
Melvin Gordon vs two first time starting DTs (one a true sophomore, one a true freshman), Welter was the MLB, and there was no Jamal Adams as a run stopper.
Offense
First year starter in true sophomore Jennings who is now at ULL. First year starting and/or playing WRs (a redshirt sophomore, redshirt freshman, and 2 true freshmen). First game for true freshman Fournette, and first game of a new zone blocking scheme ran by the OL.
The situations are just completely different. The Wisconsin passing will be much better, simply because McEvoy isn't the QB , but they lose any running advantage there that they got from the 2014 game. Clement is FAR from Gordon (seriously I don't know a Wisconsin back that matches up), and is about equal to Williams our 3rd string RB. The biggest however, is that we have Aranda now. You don't think that he has lent the LSU offensive staff ideas from stopping the guys he's coached the past 3 years???
ETA: My homer pick is 56-13 LSU win, but my realistic pick is 38-17 LSU win.
This post was edited on 9/2/16 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 9/2/16 at 9:22 pm to Leonides
We've got a team full of NFL talent and the best player in the country. Fournette, Pocic, Adams, and White would damn near all be starters next week in the NFL. I'm pumped!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News