re: Google "dramatically" swayed election results in Hillary Clinton's favor in 2016

quote:

---

The results are objective fact. How it was achieved is supposition

---

I suppose Google could argue that their algorithms were hacked and altered hence the "alleged" qualifier. My question is, where does Google fall in terms of culpability? Was it organizational? Was it a rogue programmer or two (group)? Was it an outside hack that altered their algorithms? Despite the small sample size, the results readily seem to indicate some level of accountability on the behalf of Google (employees?).
If so, what are Google's plans in terms of corrective measures? With a company of that size, issues will arise. This seems to illustrate an issue that needs to be addressed quickly. Just my .02.