Started By
Message

re: Birx completely changed her stats/projections between Friday and Sunday

Posted on 3/30/20 at 9:21 pm to
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

On Sunday she went along with Fauci's doomsday 100,000 to 200,000 possible deaths.



If you watch the video of the interview he was being asked if 100,000 was probable and he made it clear he did not think it was probable but conceded it was possible.

The worst thing was the interviewer seemed to have one objective, try to get him to say something anti Trump which Fauci did a good job dodging, when that failed they were trying to pin him down on death projections and completely misconstrued what he said.

CNN sucks donkey balls

Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 9:30 pm to
quote:

If you watch the video of the interview he was being asked if 100,000 was probable and he made it clear he did not think it was probable but conceded it was possible.
On Friday, Birx clearly inferred that 100,000 deaths was mathematically absurd.

On Sunday, Birx went along with 100,000, even 200,000 is possible.

Someone got to her. Biggest flip-flop I've seen in a while.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54235 posts
Posted on 3/30/20 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

he was being asked if 100,000 was probable and he made it clear he did not think it was probable but conceded it was possible.


He's arguing with himself and this is an expert saying this? Damn, so when we're told to believe the experts which part of that argument are we to believe?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram