- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Justice Roberts sides with liberals.....again
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:45 am to Ex-Popcorn
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:45 am to Ex-Popcorn
quote:
These are not inconsistent positions. I'm not sure we want a court that does not respect prior decisions.
this was Judge Napolitano's argument on Fox News. That Roberts was just going by precedent that had been set by Texas
1
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:45 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Ah yes, the mystical Vegas stage magic act of pregnancy where the non-sentient "clump of cells" is instantaneously transformed into an infant human, IN THE BLINK OF AN EYE!
The magical birthing canal that imparts life and sentience.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:46 am to VoxDawg
quote:
Ah yes, the mystical Vegas stage magic act of pregnancy where the non-sentient "clump of cells" is instantaneously transformed into an infant human, IN THE BLINK OF AN EYE!
it's that magic vagina dust i keep hearing about.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:46 am to Choctaw
Good
Less future bums on welfare
Less future bums on welfare
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:48 am to VoxDawg
Maybe they need to have a real investigation into those adoptions and the Epstein flight??
What a PoS! Another slap in the face for conservatives. I would say Catholics, but that would mean excommunicating Roberts, Pelosi, Biden, Kerry, etc.
What a PoS! Another slap in the face for conservatives. I would say Catholics, but that would mean excommunicating Roberts, Pelosi, Biden, Kerry, etc.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:48 am to Sentrius
quote:
They also gave us based AF Justices in Thomas and Alito.
Agreed, it’s just that the misses hurt. Nobody is perfect, but damn Roberts is off the deep end
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:48 am to Gaspergou202
quote:
Remember how W said history would judge him?
It ain’t looking good for ya Tex.
If you haven't noticed, W is pretty much a liberal now. Been loving on Clinton and Obama since Trump got elected. Guess maybe he was all along?
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:50 am to Northwestern tiger
quote:
Good
Less future bums on welfare
why stop at abortion then? why not let a single mother who can't feed her 3 and 5 year old kids just take them to the nearest "facility" and have them put to sleep like the family dog?
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:51 am to Trout Bandit
quote:
Abortion needs to be legal and readily available. The last thing we need is more unwanted children growing up to be criminals or on welfare.
As long as there’s a progressive/Marxist movement to destroy the nuclear family we’re going to see the indiscriminate murder of millions of children, particularly black children. If you raise children in a home with responsible parents (man/woman) the abortion rate will steadily decline.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:51 am to Choctaw
Roberts appointments of FISA court judges need questioned.
Remind me how a Justice becomes Chief...
Remind me how a Justice becomes Chief...
quote:
How did John Roberts get to be chief justice?
In 2005, Roberts was nominated to be an associate justice of the Supreme Court, initially to succeed the retiring Sandra Day O'Connor. When Rehnquist died before Roberts's confirmation hearings began, Bush instead nominated Roberts to fill the Chief Justice position.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:54 am to Choctaw
It's not a baby. It's blob of protoplasm until viable outside of the womb.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:57 am to HighDesert43
quote:
It's not a baby. It's blob of protoplasm until viable outside of the womb.
can't tell if you're being sarcastic
ETA: nevermind. by looking at your short post history i can tell you're not being sarcastic and aren't very bright to boot
This post was edited on 6/29/20 at 9:59 am
Posted on 6/29/20 at 9:57 am to Ex-Popcorn
[quote]These are not inconsistent positions. I'm not sure we want a court that does not respect prior decisions.[/quote
That is not bad in theory, but the ends always justify the means for the liberals. Their justice selections always band together on major cases and if they can rope one Republican appointee they win again.
This case and the recent gay right decision are not as big as the media and liberals will make them out to be. There will b much more impactful cases and hopefully Roberts will have gotten over his pique at Trump b then.
It is also way past time Republicans quit fighting the abortion issue and trying to find back door ways to limit or end it. It will not be a winner for them and they won't ;lose the base over it. There is much more harmful social upheaval in the winds and if these people leading the way today get judicial backing we will be a third world country within five years.
That is not bad in theory, but the ends always justify the means for the liberals. Their justice selections always band together on major cases and if they can rope one Republican appointee they win again.
This case and the recent gay right decision are not as big as the media and liberals will make them out to be. There will b much more impactful cases and hopefully Roberts will have gotten over his pique at Trump b then.
It is also way past time Republicans quit fighting the abortion issue and trying to find back door ways to limit or end it. It will not be a winner for them and they won't ;lose the base over it. There is much more harmful social upheaval in the winds and if these people leading the way today get judicial backing we will be a third world country within five years.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:00 am to Ex-Popcorn
quote:
These are not inconsistent positions. I'm not sure we want a court that does not respect prior decisions.
Are you actually STUPID ENOUGH to believe that any of the four liberal SCUMBAGS on the Court would ever hesitate for even a f*cking second on reversing an opinion if reversing the opinion suits their political ideology?
If so, the Georgia law on sodomy would still be good law and there would be no gay marriage.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:00 am to Eurocat
quote:
you cant murder something tghat is not alive
Wow....heart is beating at 18 days...survival rates now as early as 2 months....what do you mean "not alive"? How much more alive can you be??
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:01 am to HighDesert43
quote:
HighDesert43
Geez. Look, we've found the retard.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:02 am to Pianoman
quote:
survival rates now as early as 2 months.
Wat?
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:03 am to Choctaw
He is a major disappointment.
This post was edited on 6/29/20 at 10:05 am
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:05 am to HighDesert43
quote:
It's not a baby. It's blob of protoplasm until viable outside of the womb.
You're anti-science. The doctors keep pushing the age of viability back to earlier in the pregnancy. That alone tells you we're dealing with more than a blob here.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 10:06 am to HighDesert43
quote:
It's not a baby. It's blob of protoplasm until viable outside of the womb.
God's word says otherwise..."Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations." Jeremiah 1:5
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News