Started By
Message

re: Apparently all a girls needs to be a boy is wear boy clothes ( Elliot Page)

Posted on 12/21/20 at 8:03 pm to
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28733 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

Well, that’s not what you said in your previous post and are now simply moving the goalposts. Just say what you mean and we won’t need the song and dance.
I thought it was very strongly implied. When I suggested that your beliefs are an interpretation of a version of a translation of a transcription, did you take that to mean that I thought this was a good basis for modern government?!
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58259 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

I thought it was very strongly implied. When I suggested that your beliefs are an interpretation of a version of a translation of a transcription, did you take that to mean that I thought this was a good basis for modern government?!



We weren’t talking about using the Bible to formulate governance.
We were talking about the biological differences between men and women which lead to the subject of homosexuality, which lead to what the Bible said about the subject.
This lead you to try and discredit the text of the Bible using the,” it’s been translated over and over” excuse.
I have no idea how the subject of our discussion is now modern government.
Posted by HappyTownTiger
Member since Jan 2012
1577 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 8:09 pm to
I identify as a girl with a penis who identifies as a boy.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58259 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

Why? You advocate worry about shite like what kind of clothes a celebrity wears because you think that has some huge life altering consequences for you?


I don’t care if she wears a garbage bag. I gave several examples of why the trans movement bothers conservatives and you ignored all of
It.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28733 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

We weren’t talking about using the Bible to formulate governance.
We were talking about the biological differences between men and women which lead to the subject of homosexuality, which lead to what the Bible said about the subject.
This lead you to try and discredit the text of the Bible using the,” it’s been translated over and over” excuse.
I have no idea how the subject of our discussion is now modern government.
No idea, huh? You started this thread on the election/poli board. Now you're gonna act like you don't have a clue what the topic has to do with government and politics?


Come on, man.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58259 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

No idea, huh? You started this thread on the election/poli board. Now you're gonna act like you don't have a clue what the topic has to do with government and politics?



Have you been in here long? People routinely use the politic board to post on a wide range of topics that could be more categorized as social commentary and not purely political.
Again, you are straying far from your original themes.
Posted by NWarty
Somewhere in the PNW
Member since Sep 2013
2181 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

Have you been in here long? People routinely use the politic board to post on a wide range of topics that could be more categorized as social commentary and not purely political.
Again, you are straying far from your original themes.


This topic was covered ad naseum here in the OT for 15 pages weeks ago, so I’m not sure why you would start a topic like this in the echo chamber that is the poli/election board.

Edited for autocorrect
This post was edited on 12/21/20 at 8:52 pm
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58259 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

This topic was covered ad naseum here in the OT for 15 pages weeks ago, so I’m not sure why you would start a topic like this in the echo chamber that is the poli/election board.



So this is the root of your angst? That this subject and been covered before?
Ok.
Posted by NWarty
Somewhere in the PNW
Member since Sep 2013
2181 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

So this is the root of your angst? That this subject and been covered before? Ok.


Not really, it keeps raining like crazy here so that’s my current beef.

Just interesting that you’d post a social commentary on those boards. Probably the worst place for actual discussion of this topic considering.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58259 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

Just interesting that you’d post a social commentary on those boards. Probably the worst place for actual discussion of this topic considering.


That’s fine.
My thread was moved to the OT, and had I known it was going to be moved to a board where it’s been previously exhaustively discussed, I might have refrained from posting it.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28733 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

Have you been in here long? People routinely use the politic board to post on a wide range of topics that could be more categorized as social commentary and not purely political.
Again, you are straying far from your original themes.


Why are you acting like I'm the first one to bring up government and politics in this thread? Oh, I know, because you agree with the politics of the posters who brought up politics before I did. You even brought up social security and taxes yourself in two separate posts on page 2 before I entered the thread.

But yeah I'm the one straying far off topic, right?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28733 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

Just interesting that you’d post a social commentary on those boards. Probably the worst place for actual discussion of this topic considering.
He's obviously not interested in discussing the topic. The intent is purely to ridicule other people to make himself feel better. That's why he posted it in the echo chamber.
Posted by NWarty
Somewhere in the PNW
Member since Sep 2013
2181 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

That’s fine.
My thread was moved to the OT, and had I known it was going to be moved to a board where it’s been previously exhaustively discussed, I might have refrained from posting it.


Looking through your post history, you’ve made it fairly clear on multiple threads on the Election Board that you don’t approve of transgender persons or liberals, or democrats. (I’m on page 19 of your posts, so there’s probably a lot more). So why exactly did you start this thread? Regardless of which board it was on? To pile on? What purpose does it serve to tear others down? To be a better “Christian”?
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58259 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 9:20 pm to
quote:

So why exactly did you start this thread?


Because the story came up in my Facebook newsfeed and I am dumbfounded by the fact so many people are willingly fine with enabling another person’s psychosis if it’s politically correct.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58259 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 9:22 pm to
quote:

He's obviously not interested in discussing the topic.


I’m the one who started the topic. Now, tell me how I’m not discussing
It?
Posted by NWarty
Somewhere in the PNW
Member since Sep 2013
2181 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

Because the story came up in my Facebook newsfeed and I am dumbfounded by the fact so many people are willingly fine with enabling another person’s psychosis if it’s politically correct.


You’re dumbfounded that people outside your own bubble have differing opinions of how to treat others? Color me shocked.



Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262346 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 9:25 pm to
Hollywood types follow fads. they'll call themselves anything for attention.

Don't support Hollywood, it's always been a pit of sex abuse and child rape.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28733 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

I am dumbfounded by the fact so many people are willingly fine with enabling another person’s freedom.
FTFY
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58259 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

You’re dumbfounded that people outside your own bubble have differing opinions of how to treat others?



A woman who is biologically a woman with the chromosomes of a woman calling herself a man is not really something that’s debatable on any forum. The fact that you think it is proves my point of how far we’ve devolved.
Posted by Revelator
Member since Nov 2008
58259 posts
Posted on 12/21/20 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

Hollywood types follow fads. they'll call themselves anything for attention.


There is no doubt it’s an attention seeking move.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram