Started By
Message

re: Just diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes

Posted on 4/24/24 at 4:24 am to
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
6685 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 4:24 am to
quote:

stuntman


Awesome job you are killing it. Keep it up!
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9099 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 4:56 am to


Ditto!

My mind is still blown by how fast the change happened. I was pretty fit until I hit about 38, then I let things go to shite. The straw that broke the camel's back was a horrendous gout attack I had in Dec '22. I had read and watched a lot of different things about carnivore prior to that, especially about its effects on gout (had it for years and years prior), and said frick it, I'm all in.

Gout attacks were completely eliminated w/in 5 months. I just was not expecting as much weight loss. Initially I dropped 30lbs in the first 4 months or so, but I've put on 10lbs since then, because I was finally able to workout again.

I know there are different ways to skin a cat, but man, you saying it's a cheat code is perfectly put.

This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 5:11 am
Posted by NewOrleansBlend
Member since Mar 2008
1011 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 5:50 am to
quote:

The participants were asked to select either a low-calorie diet or LCKD.


Not randomized which introduces huge bias.

But you’re right, you can’t guarantee equal weight loss in a study. But you can design it with that goal in mind.

To be clear, I am not saying that a low carb diet is not a good strategy to treat diabetes. What I’m saying that it’s not the ONLY good strategy
This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 5:54 am
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
11144 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:14 am to
quote:

Not randomized which introduces huge bias.


What do you get after the randomization protocol is completed?

An observational study.

What do you get after randomization and people decide they don't like the group they were assigned to?

A lot of bias via non-compliance, drop out, or other issues.

Achieving valid randomization in human studies, outside of the lab, is very difficult, if not impossible.

quote:

But you’re right, you can’t guarantee equal weight loss in a study. But you can design it with that goal in mind.

You don't want to try and control the outcome values, you want to introduce an intervention and then see where the DV lands. If you try to control the DV in some way, that would introduce bias.

If you're talking about trying to make two diets iso-caloric, then see if there are differences, I understand what you mean.

quote:

To be clear, I am not saying that a low carb diet is not a good strategy to treat diabetes. What I’m saying that it’s not the ONLY good strategy

I agree.
Posted by NewOrleansBlend
Member since Mar 2008
1011 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:50 am to
quote:

What do you get after the randomization protocol is completed? An observational study. What do you get after randomization and people decide they don't like the group they were assigned to? A lot of bias via non-compliance, drop out, or other issues.


You get a randomized study. It is not observational because you have some control of the independent variable.

Compliance rate is a hugely important factor in the success of any diet, probably the most important. You shouldn’t ignore that data. A study of just the compliant patients would also provide interesting data but introduces major bias.
This post was edited on 4/24/24 at 8:53 am
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33406 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

My mind is still blown by how fast the change happened. I was pretty fit until I hit about 38, then I let things go to shite. The straw that broke the camel's back was a horrendous gout attack I had in Dec '22. I had read and watched a lot of different things about carnivore prior to that, especially about its effects on gout (had it for years and years prior), and said frick it, I'm all in.

Gout attacks were completely eliminated w/in 5 months.
They try to blame EVERYTHING on meat.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53003 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:38 pm to
There’s a g word that idk if we can it say here but if you stay away from it you’ll be healthy
Posted by DrDenim
By the airport
Member since Sep 2022
450 posts
Posted on 4/24/24 at 7:56 pm to
Gurt?
We can say that here.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53003 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 8:05 am to
It rhymes with boycrop

Basically any processed food
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
11144 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

You get a randomized study. It is not observational because you have some control of the independent variable.


You do not get a randomized study (as people think randomized connotes control and rigor), you get randomized group assignment. You only have control of assignment, and assignment is not the independent variable. The relationship between treatment (the IV) and outcome is not controlled. Modern observational studies often use propensity scores to achieve balance in the groups that serves as proxy for randomization, yet the study is still observational. Whether you randomize assignment or use propensity scores, you still end up with an observational study with regard to the relationship between IV and DV.

When you randomize groups to A and B and set them loose, then later look at an outcome, you are now in an observational study. You have no control of the groups, they will do what they want. You have no guarantees that group A follows the A protocol, etc. You can analyze it as an intention to treat model but that provides limited value.

This is not a knock on observational studies. My main point here is that when you think you have a randomized study, with randomization producing a degree of rigor and control, you're most likely not achieving that. People constantly say "randomized" and think it carries some magical wand of rigor and it doesn't.

quote:

Compliance rate is a hugely important factor in the success of any diet, probably the most important. You shouldn’t ignore that data. A study of just the compliant patients would also provide interesting data but introduces major bias.


Yes, compliance is important. I'm not suggesting you only study the compliant subjects. I'm saying that assuming you have rigor just because you randomize group assignment is going to lead to bias, which is going to be dangerous to the validity of your conclusions because you're not paying attention to it, because you've assumed that randomized group assignment took care of everything and it certainly does not.

You have to look at the data generating mechanism. If you don't, you are playing a dangerous game and won't even know it.

Tukey and others warned us about these things back in the 60s as computing power started to ramp up and people could ask a computer to crunch numbers. They knew that people would start slapping analysis schemes onto research problems without properly understanding the methods, how the data got to be what it is, and so forth. And that's exactly what has happened.
Posted by StreamsOfWhiskey
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Jun 2013
581 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 8:42 pm to
Type 1 diabetic for the last 40 years. A1Cs run in the 4.5 - 4.7 range. I lift five days a week and eat high fat/protein and low carb. I weigh 184 and am 6’1.

Read the book “Diabetes Solution” by Dr. Richard Bernstein. Read it and follow it and lead a long and healthy life.
Posted by AFtigerFan
Ohio
Member since Feb 2008
3254 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

Type 1 diabetic for the last 40 years. A1Cs run in the 4.5 - 4.7 range. I lift five days a week and eat high fat/protein and low carb. I weigh 184 and am 6’1.
Since I posted this, I’ve lost 5 pounds. I’ve eaten high protein/fat and very low carb diet. I’m eating until I’m full. I haven’t had between-meal or late night cravings. I’ve worked out every day (and will continue lifting 3 days a week and walking/running for 30 minutes at least 3 times a week. I’m a little surprised at the weight drop already. Obviously I have to stick with it, and that’s the plan.
This post was edited on 4/25/24 at 10:08 pm
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9099 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:34 am to
Hell yes!

Is your sleep improving?

And yes, it's frigging wild how fast you lose weight in the first two weeks. It's mostly water weight, but in no time flat you're going to see more definition all over your body.

Definitely bump this thread when you get your next blood test.
Posted by StreamsOfWhiskey
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Jun 2013
581 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 6:19 pm to
Best of luck to you. Type 2 is much more forgiving than Type 1, but some sacrifice is required to whip it. Stick with the plan. Looks like it’s already working.
Posted by AFtigerFan
Ohio
Member since Feb 2008
3254 posts
Posted on 4/26/24 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

Is your sleep improving?
I have OSA so I use my machine every night. I sleep like a baby. I’d love to be able to lose the machine but I was 185 pounds when I was diagnosed so I don’t think that’s in the cards for me.
Posted by Rick9Plus
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2020
1721 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 10:57 am to
I’m late to the party but as far as controlling diabetes and eating with the family, my SO did it. We cook a lean meat, a vegetable, and a starch for supper. Say, chicken, broccoli, and potatoes. The one with diabetes skips the potatoes. Brought their A1C from 8 to 4.5 by basically eating only lean meat, vegetables, and limited fruit. Seasoned but not overly. No starch at all. That is the diet that worked with no medication, combined with exercise about 4 days a week.
Posted by AFtigerFan
Ohio
Member since Feb 2008
3254 posts
Posted on 4/27/24 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

eating only lean meat, vegetables, and limited fruit.
That’s not much different from what we’re doing. I’m not too concerned about the fat though, but I have limited starches/carbs big time. I’m drinking a lot of water also. I know some of it is water weight, but I lost another pound yesterday so I’m down 6 pounds in the 5 days.
Posted by StreamsOfWhiskey
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Jun 2013
581 posts
Posted on 4/28/24 at 9:02 am to
Eating fat does not make one fat. Eating fat with carbs causes an insulin response that stores the fat you just ate. Eat as much fat as you’d like, but avoid the carbs. It will not make you fat, will make you feel satiated, and may even make you smarter (brain food).

Posted by Rick9Plus
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2020
1721 posts
Posted on 4/28/24 at 10:35 am to
Yeah, my SO eats meat or eggs and vegetables for meals, and for snacks, trail mix of nuts and dried fruit. The meat isn’t even totally lean (not just chicken breast.) There are recipes online for the Whole 30 program that i’ve used. That diet also helped my son mostly clear his eczema and 2 other skin conditions (hidradenitis and acne conglobata.) If you follow it, it works. My son fell off the wagon in college, but can go back to it when he gets tired of suffering. ETa the weight difference for my SO between A1C of 8 vs 4.5 was a loss of 7 lbs.
This post was edited on 4/28/24 at 10:37 am
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81763 posts
Posted on 4/28/24 at 11:55 am to
Mate you should get on the Keto diet ASAP. Sugar is heckin poison. Stop drinking alcohol too, it's poison.
This post was edited on 4/28/24 at 11:56 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram