Started By
Message

re: I guess this playoff makes you rethink star rankings.

Posted on 1/3/24 at 12:42 pm to
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
26878 posts
Posted on 1/3/24 at 12:42 pm to
They can both be good. It's not a zero sum game.

And correction: Deboer is 3-0 vs. Lanning.
Posted by tigerburningbright75
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since May 2011
1066 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 11:19 am to
quote:

What you aren't considering is the amount of players trying to leave their SEC teams after 3 years versus guys going to other programs expecting to be there for 4-5 years. Also a lot more cutthroat at an SEC school. I don't have numbers but I bet turnover is higher. What this means is amount of talent at any given time will be higher in the SEC, but it might be less experienced and less developed than in other programs.

Basically, these non-SEC schools don't have the impetus and need to compete for a national title every year, so their ability to develop talent is on a longer timetable. It helps them develop.

There's also the fact that the entire west coast has like 6-8 serious FBS programs. They have a lot of talent to horde.



Great analysis.
Posted by SLIPSHITE
Doyline, LA
Member since Jul 2019
520 posts
Posted on 1/4/24 at 5:06 pm to
First thing I noticed about Michigan was the speed difference from watching LSU all yr. They are fast!
Posted by TooSober
AA Meeting
Member since Oct 2015
516 posts
Posted on 1/5/24 at 9:53 am to
Michigan has 15 seniors or graduates (out of 22) on its combined first teams. 15 out of 22! and only 4 of those have transferred in.... What they have are a bunch of home grown kids that have been forged in fire for 4 to 5 years, and it makes a huge difference. This is what BK wants to get to...
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram