- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Runners interference
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:39 pm
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:39 pm
5
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:41 pm to Meauxjeaux
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:43 pm to Meauxjeaux
It was definitely interference in our game, but did you really think Birmingham was gonna over turn that for us against Bama?
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:44 pm to Broham
It took them like 2 seconds to review it. They probably didn't even look at it.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:48 pm to Broham
So this is the excuse of us missing the post season now?
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:50 pm to David121172
I don't think anyone said that.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:58 pm to Meauxjeaux
I could be wrong, but I think the Alabama runner got back in the runner's lane. This guy never did.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 5:02 pm to Geauxtigersgeaux12
quote:
could be wrong, but I think the Alabama runner got back in the runner's lane.
Actually he never did. Frame by frame shows he was still outside the lane a step or two from the base.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 5:06 pm to 76bmrlsu
quote:
There’s a thread on this
Okay, thanks.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 5:35 pm to Meauxjeaux
BS. Not interference at all. Routine run to first and bad throw. Nonsense call.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 5:45 pm to Broham
The ball got there before the runner. There was no interference.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 6:53 pm to Meauxjeaux
A poster yesterday stated the first baseman used poor fundamentals by using his left foot on the base. He was right . He could have stretched and made the catch to end the game which would have made the argument moot. The poster was right..
Posted on 5/13/24 at 6:59 pm to tigersbb
It’s like when they made up the pass interference exception during the auburn game in ~2006
Posted on 5/13/24 at 8:16 pm to tigersbb
quote:
A poster yesterday stated the first baseman used poor fundamentals by using his left foot on the base. He was right
He was wrong then, and you are wrong now. It’s obvious that the first baseman, in that situation, has to present a target well to the inside of the first base line. That is the only way to get an unobstructed throw from the catcher to the first baseman. And to do that the first baseman needs to have his left foot on the bag. Use your head. If he had his right foot on the bag he’d have had his back to the catcher as he stretched to the inside of the line.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 8:33 pm to Penrod
Posted on 5/15/24 at 9:02 am to Penrod
quote:
He was wrong then, and you are wrong now. It’s obvious that the first baseman, in that situation, has to present a target well to the inside of the first base line. That is the only way to get an unobstructed throw from the catcher to the first baseman. And to do that the first baseman needs to have his left foot on the bag. Use your head. If he had his right foot on the bag he’d have had his back to the catcher as he stretched to the inside of the line.
I don't disagree if the ball was right in front of the plate, but this throw cam from the middle of the diamond and was essentially the same angle as a throw from a third baseman on a bunt or slow chopper, albeit from closer in and the correct positioning is with the right foot for a right handed first baseman to allow for maximum flexibility and stretch radius.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News