Beatles obsession thread

It's unreal to me how fast it went once it started actually going. They really languished for almost 5 years - with some of them actually taking actual jobs instead of focusing on the band.

It's really ridiculous that they didn't even have much of a UK presence until the summer of 1962. Then, all of 1963, they lived with Beatlemania, with the States and even the rest of Europe completely ignorant or just shrugging.

Ed Sullivan was February 1964 - literally less than 2 years after EMI signed them in June 1962.

Rubber soul was released in December 1965.

Revolver was released in August 1966. Just think about that. Less than 2.5 years after Sullivan, they had changed things at least twice over (and that's completely ignoring, you know, the 3 other albums in the interim!)

The amount of quality stuff and true studio innovation they put out in such a short time is jaw dropping.

I think from Love Me Do to Let it Be was only 7 years.

I fully believe that they would have reunited in the early 80s if John were still living. What makes it so sad is that from what I have read, John was hungry to tour again and really missing the guys around the time he died. He had booked studio time to record a song with Ringo.

quote:

---

It's unreal to me how fast it went once it started actually going. They really languished for almost 5 years - with some of them actually taking actual jobs instead of focusing on the band.

It's really ridiculous that they didn't even have much of a UK presence until the summer of 1962. Then, all of 1963, they lived with Beatlemania, with the States and even the rest of Europe completely ignorant or just shrugging.

Ed Sullivan was February 1964 - literally less than 2 years after EMI signed them in June 1962.

Rubber soul was released in December 1965.

Revolver was released in August 1966. Just think about that. Less than 2.5 years after Sullivan, they had changed things at least twice over (and that's completely ignoring, you know, the 3 other albums in the interim!)

---

CCR might be even more crazy. They released their first four albums in a 15 month span between summer of 1968 and the fall of 1969. Just insane creative output. I also didn’t know that Creedence was battling the Beatles for most popular band in the world for a time.

quote:

---

CCR might be even more crazy. They released their first four albums in a 15 month span between summer of 1968 and the fall of 1969. Just insane creative output.

---

I love CCR and am fond of quoting the fecundity of their "it" couple of years. On a "let's put out a lot of music quickly" basis, yes, they are right up there. But they didn't really change the world or anything. And the offerings were more or less all of the same type.

quote:

---

I also didn’t know that Creedence was battling the Beatles for most popular band in the world for a time.

---

It's pretty true, but the Beatles were essentially broken up just a year after CCR's first came out.

the Beatles changed everything and they did it all in less time than most band take between albums or tours

there is no comparison and they have no peers

quote:

---

the Beatles changed everything and they did it all in less time than most band take between albums or tours

there is no comparison and they have no peers

---

I just don't see any other way to summarize it. It seems like there's a bit of a push to deconstruct their influence, but you just can't.

I've really enjoyed discovering some of their catalogue I never paid much attention to. e.g. Ticket to Ride. I think I always just sort of lazily wrote this one off. But it's for real - almost a metal vibe in a way.

She's Leaving Home is a revelation I don't ever remember listening to, despite the fact it's on Pepper's.

quote:

---

Laid on the living room floor, a B&W television with the whole family watching the Ed Sullivan Show.

---

Do you remember it being notable in the moment or was it more just like any other thing?

One of the books mentioned that the cast of Oliver! was on Sullivan earlier in that same show...and Davy Jones was in the cast!

quote:

---

I love the Beatles. I'm amazed when someone says they don't like them. I just don't get it. But different strokes for different folks I guess.

---

To me it's crazy to just outright not like them. But even if that's the overall judgment, the output is so varied, it seems hard to believe there's NOTHING to be found of interest.

I'm fascinated at how often they would produce a song as pastiche, only for it to be, essentially, one of the greatest songs ever in that genre. Examples:

Blues - Yer Blues This is definitely one of the greatest blues songs ever written

Louisiana Swamp Rock - Oh, Darling! Seriously, who doesn't like this song?

Folk - pick one of many

Showtune-esque - Your Mother Should Know

Rockabilly - What Goes On

BarrelHouse - Rocky Raccoon

quote:

---

I love the Beatles. I'm amazed when someone says they don't like them. I just don't get it. But different strokes for different folks I guess.

---

It just typically means that person has never sat down and actually listened to them.

quote:

---

what blows my mind about them from revolver on is that they wrote and recorded so many classic original songs and then…never played them again

---

Yeah, the brevity of their actual touring career is pretty crazy.

In reading all these books, it's abundantly clear that touring was brutal. Despite being the most sought after act in the world, they were still basically just mistreated grist in the machine.