- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are these Trump Prosecutors for real?
Posted on 4/22/24 at 4:05 pm to bayouvette
Posted on 4/22/24 at 4:05 pm to bayouvette
This trial is Trump's fault for 2 reasons.
He is 70 or so,married to a model who just had his child and decides to introduce little Donnie to a porn star. Poor judgement and a lack of impulse control.
Then the shite hits the fan. All he had to do is make the $130k payoff with personal funds and he avoids anything hitting the company books. There would be no falsification of business records. There would be no lawyer getting a home equity loan.
Now his campaign millions of dollars for legal fees because he is too cheap to come up with $130 in personal funds.
He is 70 or so,married to a model who just had his child and decides to introduce little Donnie to a porn star. Poor judgement and a lack of impulse control.
Then the shite hits the fan. All he had to do is make the $130k payoff with personal funds and he avoids anything hitting the company books. There would be no falsification of business records. There would be no lawyer getting a home equity loan.
Now his campaign millions of dollars for legal fees because he is too cheap to come up with $130 in personal funds.
0
Posted on 4/22/24 at 4:25 pm to Wildcat1996
quote:
Not wanting your dirty laundry to become public fodder constitutes illegal election interference?
I think Stormy Daniel's is Russian tradecraft. (Just like the laptop from helll that all of DC hid from the public wasn't 2020 election interference)
Posted on 4/22/24 at 5:58 pm to VOR
quote:
Pecker and the Enquirer. There’s also another woman who will be testifying on similar matters.
Pecker? Pecker is the first witness?
Who is up next?
Miles Long?
Harry Balls?
Rod Cockestein?
Dick Head?
Posted on 4/22/24 at 6:03 pm to VOR
quote:
Yes it is if you use fraudulent means to transfer funds from sources that are
not allowed to be used for those purposes. Plus, there’s the “catch and kill” conspiracy with Pecker and the Enquirer. There’s also another woman who will be testifying on similar matters. Trump is in real jeopardy.
Just the fact that this guy did not change his last name on the day of his 18th birthday is reason enough to question his credibility.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 6:38 pm to VOR
So when Hillary was fined for claiming the Steele dossier as legal expenses, she should have also had felony charges brought for lying about her opponent?
She essentially committed the same violation Trump is accused of - will you admit that and explain why she wasn’t prosecuted?
She essentially committed the same violation Trump is accused of - will you admit that and explain why she wasn’t prosecuted?
Posted on 4/22/24 at 6:41 pm to ChEgrad
In what jurisdiction would Hillary have been prosecuted. And for violation of what statute?The facts are not the same.
Posted on 4/22/24 at 6:41 pm to VOR
quote:Every presidential campaign ever has done this and it has never been anything more than a fine
Yes it is if you use fraudulent means to transfer funds from sources that are
not allowed to be used for those purposes
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News