Started By
Message

re: In Ga.... Video Monitoring Missing for 181,000 Drop Box Ballots

Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:18 am to
Posted by RammerJammer91
Member since Jan 2016
5211 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:18 am to
I'm asking because I'm struggling to find out what's going on. Clearly everything is rigged and pre-determined in GA. If that's the case, then why are Perdue and Walker running this year if the elections are rigged/pre-determined? And why will Trump announce right after the mid-terms that he'll be running in 2024 if the elections are rigged/pre-determined.

It just doesn't add up...the only things I can come up with are these people are stupid for running in elections they have already lost, or this was just an excuse made to deflect from not being in office in 2020.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56838 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Wait...... Are you calling for more video surveillance of the voting process?



It's part of chain of custody. Any vote without an auditable chain of custody is invalid and must be thrown out.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56838 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Georgia is the new Pennsylvania



Georgia is a mess
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56838 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:23 am to
quote:

I'm asking because I'm struggling to find out what's going on. Clearly everything is rigged and pre-determined in GA. If that's the case, then why are Perdue and Walker running this year if the elections are rigged/pre-determined? And why will Trump announce right after the mid-terms that he'll be running in 2024 if the elections are rigged/pre-determined.


So, an election that is filled with 20% fraudulent ballots isn't fraudulent because it's mathematically possible to still win?

You are confused because you are a simple thinker.
Posted by RammerJammer91
Member since Jan 2016
5211 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:24 am to
quote:

So, an election that is filled with 20% fraudulent ballots isn't fraudulent because it's mathematically possible to still win?

You are confused because you are a simple thinker.


I'm just asking why candidates are even running/planning to run in pre-determined elections where they've already lost.

I just can't find the reason. It appears to be 1 of 2 reasons:

1. These people are stupid and wasting in time in elections that have been rigged against them.
2. It was an excuse made to deflect from losing.

Also, Sidney Powell said the Dominion machines just need to go brrrr and they can flip the results from any ballot. They could flip the results on 50% of the ballots if they wanted to.
This post was edited on 5/24/22 at 11:26 am
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56838 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:29 am to
quote:

I'm just asking why candidates are even running/planning to run in pre-determined elections where they've already lost.


Your question shows a fundamental misunderstanding and simplistic thinking. Significant fraud is a huge problem even if it can be overcome by huge turnouts and massive efforts to watch what is going on in as many places as possible.

Your position is laughable.

Keep in mind, Democrats have been fighting for decades to prevent voter id because of the miniscule impact it may have on voting. Meanwhile, you are here saying 20% isn't a problem because it can be overcome...and therefore doesn't exist.

I think you just aren't very smart.
Posted by RammerJammer91
Member since Jan 2016
5211 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:32 am to
Sidney Powell said that the Dominion machines can flip the results from every ballot. So if you don't think they can flip the results from every ballot then you're the one who's not very smart.

You're essentially calling her a liar, which would make you a RINO cuck. Just like Tucker Carlson when he refused to have her on his show and listen to the overwhelming evidence she compiled.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
60884 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:33 am to
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46521 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:43 am to
News flash! The video monitoring requirement that was supposed to be part of drop box voting was not enforced in a lot of states and cities. R politicians in key swing states are just as much to blame as the Dim Election Technicians (Dim lawyers). Dim lawyers went through several key swing state courts and circumvented state voting laws and procedures, Republicans did not effectively push back to stop the mass mail in voting/ ballot harvesting scam. As I've been saying for over a year.....the Dims claim they cheated fair and I can't dispute their claims.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53515 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Your question shows a fundamental misunderstanding and simplistic thinking. Significant fraud is a huge problem even if it can be overcome by huge turnouts and massive efforts to watch what is going on in as many places as possible.

Your position is laughable.


He's here to derail the thread and make it about Trump... a person he does not want running.


This thread is clearly about a violation of Ga Law that is not being prosecuted on purpose.


Posted by jake wade
North LA
Member since Oct 2007
1714 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 12:08 pm to
I have to stop reading the news, it’s non stop post after post, article after article of crooked shite going on and not a damn thing being done about it. It makes me sick and occupies my mind and keeps me in a bad mood. Not one person has been accountable for this frickery.
This post was edited on 5/24/22 at 12:09 pm
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53515 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

I have to stop reading the news, it’s non stop post after post, article after article of crooked shite going on and not a damn thing being done about it. It makes me sick and occupies my mind and keeps me in a bad mood.





Yes it does. As it should. We have sat by too long and ignored it and this is the result and now the battle we have to fight or surrender to.


There are no other options.
Posted by tgerb8
Huntsvegas
Member since Aug 2007
6003 posts
Posted on 5/24/22 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

According to state and federal law, all elections records must be retained. In fact, federal law requires a 22- month retention period for election records while state law requires a 24-month retention period for election documents that are formerly considered to include videos or electronic digital files. [USC 52 20701, O.C.G.A. 21-2-73].


who would typically prosecute this? who would be prosecuted? and what kind of penalties?

I mean this is the, what, hundredth example of missing envelopes, or chain of command issues, or poll watcher suppression (all of which constitute violations of law).
If the votes were counted while the law was broken that makes them counterfeit votes. By very definition that is fraud..

but yeah.. no evidence..

We either get busy fighting back or just say, sure we'll take it up the arse, and move on.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram