- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/23/22 at 6:56 pm to NC_Tigah
Certain studies came out providing evidence that certain life processes, specifically photosynthesis, seem to exhibit properties that defy entropy. In academic honesty, it is very likely that Carnot's heat engine equations from the 1800's are inadequate for all explanations of entropy dealing with life in particular, and on the other hand, Maxwell's demon could of been replaced by God and you have a control in place to defy entropy too...
just putting a few thoughts down here in words.
just putting a few thoughts down here in words.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 10:42 am to Dawgirl
quote:
You are wrong in so many ways.
Its called the Second Law of Thermodynamics
Maybe you should read up on it.
The second law of thermodynamics applies to closed systems. The earth is not a closed system because we receive heat energy from the sun.
Here’s a good explanation that also uses mathematical proofs:
LINK
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:02 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
The earth is not a closed system because we receive heat energy from the sun.
Exactly *what* the Sun is or isn't can't actually be identified or confirmed by scientists; nevermind by using "mathematical proofs" (btw, linky no worky.)
And yes, the Earth IS absolutely a "closed system", enclosed within a Firmament. (I'll take the word of God in Genesis and real "Science" over the Pathological Liar that is Man, thank you.)
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:24 am to Liberator
quote:
Exactly *what* the Sun is or isn't can't actually be identified or confirmed by scientists; nevermind by using "mathematical proofs" (btw, linky no worky.)
And yes, the Earth IS absolutely a "closed system", enclosed within a Firmament. (I'll take the word of God in Genesis and real "Science" over the Pathological Liar that is Man, thank you.)
Obviously there is a lot that is completely wrong here, but you don’t think the sun puts out heat?!
Goddamn, I love your crazy arse.
This post was edited on 5/24/22 at 11:27 am
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:26 am to Roger Klarvin
I love when they bring up 2nd Law, it cracks me up every time.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:26 am to Liberator
quote:
Exactly *what* the Sun is or isn't can't actually be identified or confirmed by scientists; nevermind by using "mathematical proofs" (btw, linky no worky.)
And yes, the Earth IS absolutely a "closed system", enclosed within a Firmament. (I'll take the word of God in Genesis and real "Science" over the Pathological Liar that is Man, thank you.)
Look at what some of you are agreeing with.
This fricking loon.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:27 am to Liberator
quote:FYI, "firmament" is a bit of a mistranslation of the Hebrew word raki'a. Raki'a translates more accurately to "sky" or "expanse".
Firmament. (I'll take the word of God in Genesis and real "Science" over the Pathological Liar that is Man, thank you.)
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:31 am to Flats
quote:
And the Theory of Evolution would just be tweaked to encompass the new mechanism. "All forms of life descended from 2, not 1 organism. Evolution!!!"
The Theory of Evolution is...
That Evolution is a change in allele frequencies over time, and that all living things evolved. That's it.
Living things evolve. It isn't even a question.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:35 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
That Evolution is a change in allele frequencies over time, and that all living things evolved. That's it.
Do you really think "that's it"? It took me 5 seconds earlier in this thread to find a definition that was a little bit more encompassing than that.
I have zero issues with that definition; I don't personally know anybody who does.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:39 am to Flats
That is it, yes. Evolution at its simplest form.
Yes, all signs point to there being a single common ancestor to all life on Earth, and so much evidence supports it, it would be hard to contradict.
Having "two" organisms that everything evolved from wouldn't be the end of it or anything, just another thing to consider (although it is incredibly unlikely given genetics).
But if we were to discover that would be the case, the science would change. Which is the strength of science. Somehow believers psychotically try to turn that into a weakness.
Yes, all signs point to there being a single common ancestor to all life on Earth, and so much evidence supports it, it would be hard to contradict.
Having "two" organisms that everything evolved from wouldn't be the end of it or anything, just another thing to consider (although it is incredibly unlikely given genetics).
But if we were to discover that would be the case, the science would change. Which is the strength of science. Somehow believers psychotically try to turn that into a weakness.
Posted on 5/24/22 at 11:41 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Evolution at its simplest form.
But then you immediately expanded your claims. Which is it?
Page 23 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News