- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump’s lawyers enter crimes committed by other presidents that were not charged
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:07 am to BamaAtl
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:07 am to BamaAtl
quote:
When was the Democratic insurrection
Well there was that stoppage of counting votes in 5 or 6 states all at about 2 am that no one has explained yet. And to no one's surprise, when the counting resumed, Biden had gained votes by leaps and bounds.
1
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:16 am to Lg
quote:
Well there was that stoppage of counting votes in 5 or 6 states all at about 2 am that no one has explained yet.
Not explained to you, personally?
Because they're explained by state law and the circumstances at the time, in every instance.
quote:
And to no one's surprise, when the counting resumed, Biden had gained votes by leaps and bounds.
Oh, the problem is that you don't understand how elections in the US work. That is something you should probably learn about before you start whining on here.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:22 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Jack Smith should be jailed for it.
And several Judges disbarred.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:22 am to Placekicker
Clinton lied under oath
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:26 am to Jimbeaux
quote:
private act of A POTUS?
private act of A POSUS?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:28 am to BamaAtl
quote:
BamaAtl
I can't say I've ever actively wished for someone Downtown to get punched in the tit by a homeless person, but you're an inspiration.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:31 am to RougeDawg
quote:
Clinton obstruction of justice and perjury. (video)
It was too sickening to get through the introduction.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:33 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Because they're explained by state law and the circumstances at the time, in every instance.
US 3rd Circuit and the Wisconsin Supreme Court disagree with you. You ignorant moron.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:36 am to jrodLSUke
quote:
A Trump DOJ may even pursue a SCOTUS ruling after the election in order to 1. further protect Trump, or 2. Go after Biden. Or both.
Assuming you mean the current DOJ minus a quarter million Osama/counton lawyers.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:41 am to BamaAtl
quote:
Oh, the problem is that you don't understand how elections in the US work. That is something you should probably learn about before you start whining on here.
So please, please cite the election that that has EVER happened in before? You can even go down to school board elections. Why was it allowed in Fulton County, Georgia that EVERYBODY was sent home except for a few Dem operatives to remain? No signature verification on absentee ballots? Mass mail out of ballots? NEVER EVER happened before. EVER.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:46 am to Lg
Her TV told her that everything was cool, so go back to her Real Housewives marathon.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:48 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:Lol what the frick does this even mean?
The case really boils down to official acts vs private acts.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 12:28 pm to BamaAtl
The fact that there were "official" advertised meetings of the other electors could be enough to suffice. It was not as though these fools were doing it in the dark prior to official certification in the states..
The documents case is where he has the greatest exposure. The "insurrection"and RICO are pretty weak overall.....I mean, you are telling Trump that he's not allowed to challenge something that he believes to be challengeable and Smith's assertion is that it is an illegal scheme when election law is somewhat unclear on the issue. Smith would have done better to outwardly suggest that Trump tried to insight insurrection. If you buy his assertion, all of it, then you start getting into free speech rights, Smith's denials notwithstanding in the indictment.
Bragg's case is a twisted mess. If you have to do both sides of the Glenn Beck chalkboard to explain how you get to being even close to a crime, your case is not even a house of cards.
Beat Trump at the ballot box, it's the only way to be rid of him.
The documents case is where he has the greatest exposure. The "insurrection"and RICO are pretty weak overall.....I mean, you are telling Trump that he's not allowed to challenge something that he believes to be challengeable and Smith's assertion is that it is an illegal scheme when election law is somewhat unclear on the issue. Smith would have done better to outwardly suggest that Trump tried to insight insurrection. If you buy his assertion, all of it, then you start getting into free speech rights, Smith's denials notwithstanding in the indictment.
Bragg's case is a twisted mess. If you have to do both sides of the Glenn Beck chalkboard to explain how you get to being even close to a crime, your case is not even a house of cards.
Beat Trump at the ballot box, it's the only way to be rid of him.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:10 pm to Mickey Goldmill
STFU nerd. 
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:11 pm to Jimbeaux
quote:
Is taking bribes from corrupt foreign governments through family members as middlemen n official duty or a private act of A POTUS?
Boom.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:18 pm to ninthward
quote:
Lol what the frick does this even mean?
It’s their talking point.
It’s what all of the cool pink/blue hairs are saying.
Each one of them deduced this important legal distinction
independently
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:20 pm to VoxDawg
"muh NO PROOF!" Because they conveniently refused to ignore the proof.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:27 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
He'll still get his delay because SCOTUS is corrupt,
Know how I know you watch Joy Reid?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 1:41 pm to Rebel
quote:
Should this case go through, every ex-president will stand trial.
That's where you're wrong
Republican Presidents will all stand trial but not one Democrat will
You really think the spineless bunch of pussies in the GOPe would do anything?
If anything they'll cower down even further because they'll fear the Left will come after them, if they can put a President on trial who can't they target?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 6:33 pm to Mickey Goldmill
So if I work at Walmart as a cashier, and I believe there’s a 20 missing from the register, and I go to the shift supervisor and say “we need to find this money”, I’ve committed a private crime that has nothing to do with my capacity as a cashier employed by Walmart?
This lawfare is REALLY testing your ability to spin up bullshite
This lawfare is REALLY testing your ability to spin up bullshite
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News